Mental Health & Behavioral Sciences Section (MHBSS), James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Mental Health & Behavioral Sciences Section (MHBSS), James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul;104(7):1062-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
To explore the factor structure of the Rehabilitation Needs Survey (RNS).
Secondary analysis of observational cohort study who were 5-years post-traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Five Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.
Veterans enrolled in the TBI Model Systems longitudinal study who completed the RNS at 5-year follow-up (N=378).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): RNS.
RNS factor structure was examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with oblique rotation. Analyses returned 2- and 3-factor solutions with Cronbach alphas ranging from 0.715 to 0.905 and corrected item-total correlations that ranged from 0.279 to 0.732. The 2-factor solution accounted for 61.7% of the variance with ≥3 exclusively loading items on each factor with acceptable internal consistency metrics and was selected as the most parsimonious and clinically applicable model. Ad hoc analysis found the RNS structure per the EFA corresponded with elements of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) conceptual framework. All factors had adequate internal consistency (α≥0.70) and 20 of the 21 demonstrated good discrimination (corrected item-total correlations≥0.40).
The 2-factor solution of the RNS appears to be a useful model for enhancing its clinical interpretability. Although there were cross-loading items, they refer to complex rehabilitation needs that are likely influenced by multiple factors. Alternatively, there are items that may require alteration and redundant items that should be considered for elimination.
探索康复需求调查(RNS)的因素结构。
对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后 5 年的观察性队列研究进行二次分析。
五家住院康复机构。
参加 TBI 模型系统纵向研究并在 5 年随访时完成 RNS 的退伍军人(N=378)。
RNS。
采用斜交旋转的探索性因子分析(EFA)对 RNS 的因子结构进行了检验。分析得到了 2 因子和 3 因子解决方案,Cronbach 阿尔法值范围为 0.715 至 0.905,校正后的条目-总分相关性范围为 0.279 至 0.732。2 因子解决方案解释了 61.7%的方差,每个因子上至少有 3 个独占的项目,具有可接受的内部一致性指标,并被选为最简约和最具临床适用性的模型。特别分析发现,EFA 得出的 RNS 结构与功能、残疾和健康国际分类(ICF)概念框架的要素相对应。所有因子的内部一致性均良好(α≥0.70),21 个中有 20 个显示出良好的辨别力(校正后的条目-总分相关性≥0.40)。
RNS 的 2 因子解决方案似乎是增强其临床可解释性的有用模型。尽管存在交叉加载项目,但它们涉及到可能受多种因素影响的复杂康复需求。或者,有些项目可能需要改变,有些冗余项目则应考虑删除。