Highlighting Gender Differences in RLS: Analysis of Gender in Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Volume in Urology Vs Other Subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the involvement of women surgeons in RLS over time and across fields. While women are an increasing proportion of the urological workforce, the overall percentage of women urologists remains low. As robotic/laparoscopic surgery (RLS) has become first-line for many surgical problems, we hypothesized that women in urology may have lower participation than other specialties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained country-wide data by surgeon from the Data.CMS.gov database for 2014-2019 for major RLS procedures in colorectal surgery, gynecology, thoracic surgery, and urology. Data were sorted by gender and CPT code. Temporal trends were assessed, and estimation was performed by exponential regression comparing means and rates of change between departments and surgeon genders.

RESULTS

Surgeons across disciplines and genders showed increases in RLS volume over time (P <.05). There were significant differences between men and women surgeons between specialties in average number of surgeons (P <.0001) and rate of change over time (P = .0035). The difference of the rate of increase in the number of surgeons performing RLS between genders was significant for all disciplines, suggesting women were entering RLS surgery faster than men across specialties (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a disparity in RLS procedure performance in men vs women across surgical disciplines. The greatest discrepancy in participation between genders existed in Urology, despite the field having a higher percentage of women physicians than other some subspecialties. Targeted action to address barriers to women surgeons' participation in RLS will increase diversity of thought and improve clinical care.