Suppr超能文献

角膜移植治疗感染性角膜炎:一项前瞻性荷兰注册研究。

Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study.

机构信息

University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cornea. 2023 Nov 1;42(11):1414-1421. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003218. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze real-world practice patterns and graft survival after corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis in the Netherlands.

METHODS

All consecutive keratoplasties for infectious keratitis registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were included. Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with Cox regression to compare the 3 most common pathogens with subgroup analysis for type and reason of transplantation, sex, and graft size. Multivariable analysis was performed using the same explanatory factors.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2017, 1111 keratoplasties for infectious keratitis were registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry. The most common pathogens were viruses (n = 437), bacteria (n = 271), and Acanthamoeba (n = 121). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching did not provide a significant survival benefit, whereas emergency procedures showed worse graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, P = 0.120; HR = 2.73, P < 0.001, respectively]. Graft size >8.5 mm was significantly worse than graft size 8.5 mm (HR = 2.062, P = 0.010). In therapeutic keratoplasty, graft survival was significantly worse for Acanthamoeba than viral keratitis (HR = 2.36, P = 0.008). In the multivariable model, adjusting for graft size, type, and reason for transplantation, viral and bacterial keratitis did not differ significantly in graft survival, and Acanthamoeba showed a significantly worse prognosis (vs. viral keratitis, HR = 2.30, P < 0.001; bacterial keratitis, HR = 2.65, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Viral keratitis was the most common indication for transplantation, followed by bacterial and Acanthamoeba keratitis. HLA matching did not offer protection over elective non-HLA-matched procedures, whereas emergency procedures and grafts sized >8.5 mm showed poor survival. In optical keratoplasty, survival is high for all pathogens, whereas in therapeutic keratoplasty Acanthamoeba shows poor outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析荷兰角膜移植治疗感染性角膜炎的真实实践模式和移植物存活率。

方法

纳入荷兰器官移植登记处连续登记的所有感染性角膜炎角膜移植术。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和 Cox 回归分析移植物存活率,比较 3 种最常见的病原体,并进行亚组分析,包括移植类型和原因、性别和移植物大小。使用相同的解释因素进行多变量分析。

结果

2007 年至 2017 年,荷兰器官移植登记处共登记了 1111 例感染性角膜炎角膜移植术。最常见的病原体是病毒(n = 437)、细菌(n = 271)和棘阿米巴(n = 121)。人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配并不能提供显著的生存获益,而急诊手术显示移植物存活率较差[风险比(HR)= 0.40,P = 0.120;HR = 2.73,P < 0.001]。移植物大小>8.5 mm 显著差于移植物大小 8.5 mm(HR = 2.062,P = 0.010)。在治疗性角膜移植中,棘阿米巴角膜炎的移植物存活率明显差于病毒性角膜炎(HR = 2.36,P = 0.008)。在多变量模型中,调整移植物大小、类型和移植原因后,病毒性和细菌性角膜炎的移植物存活率无显著差异,而棘阿米巴显示出明显较差的预后(与病毒性角膜炎相比,HR = 2.30,P < 0.001;与细菌性角膜炎相比,HR = 2.65,P < 0.001)。

结论

病毒性角膜炎是最常见的移植适应证,其次是细菌性和棘阿米巴角膜炎。HLA 匹配并不能提供优于非 HLA 匹配的选择性手术的保护,而急诊手术和移植物大小>8.5 mm 则显示出较差的存活率。在光学性角膜移植中,所有病原体的存活率均较高,而在治疗性角膜移植中,棘阿米巴的预后较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f30/10538606/a9292b931bea/cornea-42-1414-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验