Suppr超能文献

经气管吸引物半乳甘露聚糖检测对指导支气管肺泡灌洗诊断侵袭性曲霉病的作用。

Performance of galactomannan testing from endotracheal aspirate to guide bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.

机构信息

Max von Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, LMU München, Munich, Germany.

Diagnostic and Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Infection. 2023 Jun;51(3):769-774. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-01985-1. Epub 2023 Feb 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Invasive aspergillosis is a major threat to immunocompromised individuals. Galactomannan (GM) is used as a biomarker for invasive aspergillosis. Investigations recommended in current guidelines include GM testing of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids. GM testing of endotracheal aspirate, the sampling of which is less invasive, less resource-intensive and less aerosol-generating, is not validated. We compared the performance of endotracheal aspirate GM as a screening tool to predict BAL fluid GM-positivity in patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis.

METHODS

Of each patient, a pair of corresponding endotracheal aspirate and BAL fluid samples was tested and compared for GM results. Two sample sets were included. The first consisted of 140 consecutive BAL fluid/endotracheal aspirate pairs obtained from 133 patients. The pairs of the second sample set (n = 38) were selected based on the criterion that the BAL tested positive for GM. All specimens were obtained in a German 2,000 bed tertiary care center.

RESULTS

Among BAL fluid GM-positive samples, endotracheal aspirate GM demonstrated poor specificity (72%) but high sensitivity (92% in predicting BAL fluid GM of ≥ 0.50 and 91% for BAL fluid GM of ≥ 1.00) and an excellent negative predictive value (98%). The use of a marginally elevated cutoff of 0.63 resulted in an improved specificity (72-81%), without loss of sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

For screening purposes, one might consider testing endotracheal aspirate for GM, which could help avoid unnecessary BAL.

摘要

目的

侵袭性曲霉病是免疫功能低下个体的主要威胁。半乳甘露聚糖(GM)被用作侵袭性曲霉病的生物标志物。目前指南中推荐的检测方法包括对支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)进行 GM 检测。尚未对经气管抽吸物(GM 检测标本的侵袭性更小、资源需求更少且气溶胶生成更少)的检测进行验证。我们比较了经气管抽吸物 GM 作为预测疑似侵袭性曲霉病患者 BAL 液 GM 阳性的筛查工具的性能。

方法

对每位患者的一对相应的经气管抽吸物和 BAL 液样本进行了检测和比较,并比较了 GM 结果。包括两个样本集。第一个样本集包括从 133 名患者中获得的 140 对连续的 BAL 液/经气管抽吸物。第二个样本集(n=38)的样本对是根据 BAL 液 GM 检测阳性的标准选择的。所有标本均来自德国一家拥有 2000 张床位的三级护理中心。

结果

在 BAL 液 GM 阳性样本中,经气管抽吸物 GM 的特异性较差(72%),但灵敏度较高(预测 BAL 液 GM≥0.50 的灵敏度为 92%,预测 BAL 液 GM≥1.00 的灵敏度为 91%),阴性预测值极好(98%)。使用略高的截止值 0.63 可提高特异性(72-81%),而不损失灵敏度。

结论

为了筛查目的,人们可能会考虑检测 GM 经气管抽吸物,这有助于避免不必要的 BAL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63d/10205871/7644d4cf6224/15010_2023_1985_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验