Suppr超能文献

臀位分娩与头位分娩的引产比较:效果和特征。

Breech presentation induction compared to cephalic presentation: Effectiveness and characteristics.

机构信息

CHU Lille, Department of Obstetrics, F-59000 Lille, France.

Department of Biostatistics, CHRU Lille, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Mar;282:155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of our study was to compare the effectiveness of induction in cephalic presentations to that of breech presentations as well as the characteristics of the latter and the maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study carried out at the Lille University Hospital in the Jeanne de Flandre Maternity Hospital including all patients with a breech fetus for whom an induction was indicated beyond 37 weeks of gestation between January 2014 and December 2020. A matching was performed to include 2 cephalic presentations for one breech presentation. The primary outcome was successful induction defined by two things: passage into the active phase (cervical dilatation > 5 cm) and vaginal delivery.

RESULTS

101 inductions of breech presentations were included and matched to 202 cephalic presentations. After adjustment by BISHOP score, there was no significant difference in the caesarean section rate between the two groups (25.7% in cephalic vs 33.7% in breech, OR 0.67 [CI95% 0.38-1.18]) or in the rate of transition to active phase (80.7% in cephalic vs 82.2% in breech, OR 1.26 [CI95% 0.65-2.44]). Post-partum blood loss was not significantly different between the two groups (14.4% in cephalic vs 12.9% in breech, OR 1.22 [CI95% 0.57-2.57]). Moderate neonatal acidosis was more frequent in the breech group (6,4% in cephalic vs 15,8% in breech, OR 3.04 [CI95% 1.38-6.71]).

CONCLUSION

Induction of breech births beyond 37 weeks of gestation appeared to be as effective as induction of cephalic presentations. There was no difference in the rate of caesarean section and transition to active labor. Maternal morbidity was not increased.

摘要

简介

我们研究的目的是比较头位分娩与臀位分娩的引产效果,以及后者的特点、母婴发病率和死亡率。

材料和方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,在里尔大学附属医院让娜·德·弗兰德妇产医院进行,纳入了所有在 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间妊娠 37 周以上且需要引产的臀位胎儿患者。对每个臀位胎儿匹配 2 例头位胎儿。主要结局是成功引产,定义为两个方面:进入活跃期(宫颈扩张>5cm)和阴道分娩。

结果

共纳入 101 例臀位引产,并与 202 例头位分娩相匹配。在 BISHOP 评分校正后,两组剖宫产率无显著差异(头位组 25.7%,臀位组 33.7%,OR 0.67[95%CI95%0.38-1.18]),也无活跃期转化率的差异(头位组 80.7%,臀位组 82.2%,OR 1.26[95%CI95%0.65-2.44])。两组产后出血量无显著差异(头位组 14.4%,臀位组 12.9%,OR 1.22[95%CI95%0.57-2.57])。臀位组新生儿中度酸中毒更常见(头位组 6.4%,臀位组 15.8%,OR 3.04[95%CI95%1.38-6.71])。

结论

妊娠 37 周以上臀位分娩的引产似乎与头位分娩的引产效果一样好。剖宫产率和进入活跃期的比例没有差异。产妇发病率没有增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验