Suppr超能文献

外倒转术后的分娩方式与新生儿结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Rosman A N, Vlemmix F, Ensing S, Opmeer B C, Te Hoven S, Velzel J, de Hundt M, van den Berg S, Rota H, van der Post J A M, Mol B W J, Kok M

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2016 Aug;39:44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to assess the mode of childbirth and adverse neonatal outcomes in women with a breech presentation with or without an external cephalic version attempt, and to compare the mode of childbirth among women with successful ECV to women with a spontaneous cephalic presentation.

DESIGN

prospective matched cohort study.

SETTING

25 clusters (hospitals and its referring midwifery practices) in the Netherlands. Data of the Netherlands perinatal registry for the matched cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

singleton pregnancies from January 2011 to August 2012 with a fetus in breech presentation and a childbirth from 36 weeks gestation onwards. Spontaneous cephalic presentations (selected from national registry 2009 and 2010) were matched in a 2:1 ratio to cephalic presentations after a successful version attempt. Matching criteria were maternal age, parity, gestational age at childbirth and fetal gender. Main outcomes were mode of childbirth and neonatal outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

of 1613 women eligible for external cephalic version, 1169 (72.5%) received an ECV attempt. The overall caesarean childbirth rate was significantly lower compared to women who did not receive a version attempt (57% versus 87%; RR 0.66 (0.62-0.70)). Women with a cephalic presentation after ECV compared to women with a spontaneous cephalic presentation had a decreased risk for instrumental vaginal childbirth (RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.29-0.94)) and an increased risk of overall caesarean childbirth (RR 1.7 (95%CI 1.2-2.5)).

KEY CONCLUSIONS

women who had a successful ECV are at increased risk for a caesarean childbirth but overall, ECV is an important tool to reduce the caesarean rate.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

ECV is an important tool to reduce the caesarean section rates.

摘要

目的

评估臀位产妇(无论是否尝试外倒转术)的分娩方式及不良新生儿结局,并比较成功实施外倒转术的产妇与自然头位产妇的分娩方式。

设计

前瞻性匹配队列研究。

地点

荷兰的25个群组(医院及其转诊助产机构)。匹配队列的荷兰围产期登记数据。

参与者

2011年1月至2012年8月的单胎妊娠,胎儿为臀位且妊娠36周及以后分娩。自然头位分娩者(选自2009年和2010年国家登记数据)与成功实施外倒转术后转为头位分娩者按2:1比例匹配。匹配标准为产妇年龄、产次、分娩时孕周及胎儿性别。主要结局为分娩方式及新生儿结局。

测量与结果

1613名符合外倒转术条件的产妇中,1169名(72.5%)尝试了外倒转术。与未尝试外倒转术的产妇相比,总体剖宫产率显著降低(57%对87%;相对危险度0.66(0.62 - 0.70))。与自然头位产妇相比,外倒转术后转为头位的产妇器械助产分娩风险降低(相对危险度0.52(95%可信区间0.29 - 0.94)),总体剖宫产风险增加(相对危险度1.7(95%可信区间1.2 - 2.5))。

关键结论

成功实施外倒转术的产妇剖宫产风险增加,但总体而言,外倒转术是降低剖宫产率的重要手段。

对实践的启示

外倒转术是降低剖宫产率的重要手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验