From the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;43(1):25-34. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.25. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
There are conflicting results in studies investigating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during or outside of usual hospital working hours. While some researchers have reported higher mortality rates in STEMI patients admitted outside of working hours, others did not find a statistically significant difference.
Investigate the short-term endpoints and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients by time of admission.
Retrospective SETTING: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.
Patients were grouped by admission, which consisted of four intervals: 06:00 to <12:00, 12:00 to <18:00, 18:00 to <24:00, and 24:00 to <06:00. We analyzed demographic, clinical and mortality by admission time interval and mortality by multivariate analyses, including the time intervals.
Clinical data and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 735 patients; median (IQR) age 62 (22) years; 215 (29.3%) women.
Patients admitted at night were 1.37 times more likely to experience pulmonary edema than patients whose symptoms started in the daytime (=.012); 32.9% of the patients whose symptoms started at night presented with Killip class II-IV, while during the daytime, 21.4% presented with Killip class II-IV (=.001). Among the patients, the most common was inferior STEMI (38.6%). However, no-reflow was significantly higher during the daytime compared to the nighttime (=.12). The risk of the cardiac arrest on admission was 1.2 times higher in patients admitted at night (=.034). Neither time interval of admission nor several other variables had an effect on clinical outcome or mortality.
While patients admitted at night presented with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock more frequently, no reflow was observed during the day after the procedure. Although patients admitted at night with STEMI presented with worse clinical conditions, similar results were observed between the groups in clinical outcomes.
More "real world" results might have been obtained if the study had replicated more typical referral conditions for PCI.
None.
在研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者预后的影响时,存在结果相互矛盾的情况。一些研究人员报告称,在非工作时间内入院的 STEMI 患者死亡率更高,而另一些研究人员则未发现统计学上的显著差异。
通过患者入院时间,调查 STEMI 患者的短期终点和长期预后。
回顾性
三级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心。
患者根据入院时间分为四组:06:00 至 <12:00、12:00 至 <18:00、18:00 至 <24:00 和 24:00 至 <06:00。我们分析了按入院时间间隔分组的人口统计学、临床和死亡率,并通过多变量分析包括时间间隔来分析死亡率。
临床数据和死亡率
735 例患者;中位数(IQR)年龄 62(22)岁;215(29.3%)例女性。
夜间入院的患者发生肺水肿的可能性比白天症状开始的患者高 1.37 倍(=0.012);夜间症状开始的患者中有 32.9%出现 Killip Ⅱ-Ⅳ级,而白天症状开始的患者中有 21.4%出现 Killip Ⅱ-Ⅳ级(=0.001)。在这些患者中,最常见的是下壁 STEMI(38.6%)。然而,与夜间相比,日间无复流明显更高(=0.12)。夜间入院的患者入院时发生心脏骤停的风险是白天的 1.2 倍(=0.034)。入院时间间隔或其他几个变量均未对临床结果或死亡率产生影响。
尽管夜间入院的患者更常出现肺水肿和心源性休克,但在手术后白天无复流。尽管夜间入院的 STEMI 患者的临床状况较差,但两组之间的临床结果相似。
如果研究复制了更典型的 PCI 转诊条件,可能会获得更多“真实世界”的结果。
无。