• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

枕大神经阻滞预防慢性偏头痛的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。

Greater occipital nerve blockade for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, G B Pant institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Department of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2023 Feb;43(2):3331024221143541. doi: 10.1177/03331024221143541.

DOI:10.1177/03331024221143541
PMID:36739512
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Greater occipital nerve blockade for the prevention of chronic migraine has a limited evidence base. A robust randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is needed.

METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, following a baseline period of four weeks, randomly assigned patients of chronic migraine 1:1 to receive four-weekly bilateral greater occipital nerve blockade with either 2 ml of 2% (40 mg) lidocaine (active group) or 2 ml of 0.9% saline (placebo) injections for 12 weeks. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were a change from the baseline in the mean number of headache and migraine days and the achievement of ≥50% reduction in headache days from baseline across the weeks 9-12 respectively. Safety evaluations included the documentation and reporting of serious and other adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients each were randomly allocated to the active and placebo group. Baseline demography and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Mean headache and migraine days at baseline (±SD) were 23.4 ± 4.4 and 15.6 ± 5.7 days in the active group and 22.6 ± 5.0 and 14.6 ± 4.6 days in the placebo group respectively. The active group compared to the placebo had a significantly greater least-squares mean reduction in the number of headache and migraine days (-4.2 days [95% CI: -7.5 to -0.8; p  =  0.018] and -4.7 days [95%CI: -7.7 to -1.7; p = 0.003] respectively). 40.9% of patients in the active group achieved ≥50% reduction in headache days as compared with 9.1% of patients receiving a placebo (p = 0.024). Overall, 64 mild and transient adverse events were reported by 16 patients in the active group and 15 in the placebo. No death or serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Four-weekly greater occipital nerve blockade with 2% lidocaine for 12 weeks was superior to placebo in decreasing the average number of headache and migraine days in patients with chronic migraine with a good tolerability profile.Clinical trial.gov no. CTRI 2020/07/026709.

摘要

背景

用于预防慢性偏头痛的枕大神经阻滞的证据有限。需要进行一项稳健的随机双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

方法

这项双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验,在四周的基线期后,将慢性偏头痛患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受为期 12 周的每四周一次的双侧枕大神经阻滞,分别接受 2ml 2%(40mg)利多卡因(活性组)或 2ml 0.9%生理盐水(安慰剂)注射。主要和关键次要疗效终点分别为从基线开始,头痛和偏头痛天数的平均值变化,以及在第 9-12 周期间从基线开始头痛天数减少 50%。安全性评估包括记录和报告严重不良事件和其他不良事件。

结果

每组 22 名患者被随机分配到活性组和安慰剂组。两组的基线人口统计学和临床特征相似。活性组和安慰剂组的基线平均头痛和偏头痛天数分别为 23.4±4.4 天和 15.6±5.7 天,22.6±5.0 天和 14.6±4.6 天。与安慰剂组相比,活性组在头痛和偏头痛天数的减少方面有显著更大的最小二乘均数减少(分别为-4.2 天[95%CI:-7.5 至-0.8;p=0.018]和-4.7 天[95%CI:-7.7 至-1.7;p=0.003])。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,40.9%的活性组患者达到了头痛天数减少 50%以上(p=0.024)。总体而言,活性组有 16 名患者和安慰剂组有 15 名患者报告了 64 例轻度和短暂的不良事件。没有死亡或严重不良事件报告。

结论

2%利多卡因每四周一次进行 12 周的枕大神经阻滞治疗,在减少慢性偏头痛患者的平均头痛和偏头痛天数方面优于安慰剂,且具有良好的耐受性。临床试验编号 CTRI 2020/07/026709。

相似文献

1
Greater occipital nerve blockade for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.枕大神经阻滞预防慢性偏头痛的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Cephalalgia. 2023 Feb;43(2):3331024221143541. doi: 10.1177/03331024221143541.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment of topiramate and greater occipital nerve block versus topiramate monotherapy for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial.托吡酯联合枕大神经阻滞与托吡酯单药治疗预防慢性偏头痛的疗效和耐受性:一项随机对照试验。
Cephalalgia. 2022 Aug;42(9):859-871. doi: 10.1177/03331024221082077. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Occipital nerve block for the short-term preventive treatment of migraine: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.枕神经阻滞用于偏头痛的短期预防性治疗:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Cephalalgia. 2015 Oct;35(11):959-68. doi: 10.1177/0333102414561872. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial.加巴喷丁治疗失败的偏头痛预防性药物患者(CONQUER)的安全性和疗效:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3b 期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Oct;19(10):814-825. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
ANODYNE study: A double-blind randomized trial of greater occipital nerve block of methylprednisolone and lignocaine versus placebo as a transitional preventive treatment for episodic cluster headache.ANODYNE 研究:甲泼尼龙和利多卡因的枕大神经阻滞与安慰剂作为发作性丛集性头痛的过渡性预防治疗的双盲随机试验。
Cephalalgia. 2024 Oct;44(10):3331024241291597. doi: 10.1177/03331024241291597.
6
Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.托吡酯可减少慢性偏头痛的头痛天数:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Cephalalgia. 2007 Jul;27(7):814-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01326.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
7
Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.TEV-48125 用于慢性偏头痛预防性治疗的安全性、耐受性和疗效:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、2b 期研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Nov;14(11):1091-100. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00245-8. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Greater occipital and supraorbital nerve blockade for the preventive treatment of migraine: a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.枕大神经和眶上神经阻滞预防偏头痛的治疗:一项单盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):909-915. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1532403. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.托吡酯治疗慢性偏头痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Headache. 2007 Feb;47(2):170-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00684.x.
10
Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial.依普替扎umab 预防偏头痛的安全性和疗效在有两到四次先前预防治疗失败的患者中(DELIVER):一项多臂、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3b 期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jul;21(7):597-607. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00185-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve blockade in menstrual migraine.枕大神经阻滞治疗月经性偏头痛的疗效评估
BMC Neurol. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04070-2.
2
Occipital nerve block for headaches: a narrative review.枕神经阻滞治疗头痛:一篇叙述性综述。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2024 Jun;38(2):1-10. doi: 10.22514/jofph.2024.010. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
Effective Acupuncture in Treating Decade-Long Occipital Neuralgia in an Elderly Patient.有效针灸治疗老年患者长达十年的枕神经痛
Am J Case Rep. 2024 Dec 5;25:e945546. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.945546.
4
Assessing the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve block in chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估大枕神经阻滞治疗慢性偏头痛的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03834-6.
5
The effect of physical therapy integrated with pharmacotherapy on tension-type headache and migraine in children and adolescents.物理疗法联合药物治疗对儿童和青少年紧张型头痛和偏头痛的影响。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03833-7.
6
Comparison of two methods of greater occipital nerve block in patients with chronic migraine: ultrasound-guided and landmark-based techniques.两种慢性偏头痛患者枕大神经阻滞方法的比较:超声引导与体表标志定位技术。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03816-8.
7
Comparison of Greater Occipital Nerve Blockade and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade in Patients with Episodic Migraine.发作性偏头痛患者枕大神经阻滞与蝶腭神经节阻滞的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 May 21;13(11):3027. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113027.