Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms Merchant, Ms. Soyemi, Mses Roytman and DiTosto, and Niznik and Dr Yee).
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms Merchant, Ms. Soyemi, Mses Roytman and DiTosto, and Niznik and Dr Yee); Brown University, Providence, RI (Ms Soyemi).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 May;5(5):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100884. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
This study was a systematic review aimed to assess published literature regarding healthcare-based interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy and their effects on patient-reported, pregnancy, or nutritional outcomes.
A systematic search was performed in February 2022 (subsequently updated in August 2022) using Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus using terms related to food insecurity interventions during pregnancy.
Studies examining healthcare-based interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy with patient-reported outcomes (eg, program satisfaction), adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, preterm birth), or nutritional outcomes (eg, dietary intake) were included. Studies using data before 1995, conducted outside the United States, or focused solely on dietary content or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program as the intervention of interest were excluded.
Of note, 3 authors screened the abstracts and full articles for inclusion. The final cohort included 5 studies. Moreover, 3 authors independently extracted data from each article and assessed the study quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations and the risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tools.
Overall, 5 studies describing the interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy were included. Study designs included prospective cohort (n=1) and retrospective cohort (n=4) studies. There was heterogeneity in the type of intervention, with 3 using food vouchers, 1 focusing on a group prenatal service with nutrition and food management education, and 1 using a food connection program. Most studies (4 [80%]) shared patient-reported outcomes (eg, food security levels and program utilization rates), with 2 studies examining pregnancy-related outcomes (ie, glucose level, blood pressure, and preterm birth) and 2 studies examining nutritional outcomes. The interventions were associated with improved levels of food insecurity, reduced odds of preterm birth, and improved blood pressure trends; the findings demonstrated a 56% to 81% program utilization rate. All studies exhibited moderate to low study quality, with fair to good internal validity.
Although data on healthcare-based interventions targeted at food insecurity during pregnancy are limited, the few studies identified suggest that such interventions may affect pregnancy outcomes. A better understanding of the local scope and context of food insecurity and community-based organizations' efforts not captured by the literature in this area can help inform the development of interventions targeting food access during pregnancy.
本研究是一项系统综述,旨在评估已发表的文献,这些文献涉及针对孕期食品不安全问题的基于医疗保健的干预措施,以及这些措施对患者报告的、与妊娠相关的或营养相关的结果的影响。
2022 年 2 月(随后于 2022 年 8 月更新),使用 Embase、Medline、Cochrane 图书馆和 Scopus 数据库,使用与孕期食品不安全干预措施相关的术语进行了系统检索。
纳入研究包括基于医疗保健的干预措施,以解决孕期食品不安全问题,并报告患者报告的结果(如项目满意度)、不良妊娠结局(如早产)或营养结局(如饮食摄入)。排除使用 1995 年以前的数据、在美国以外进行的研究,或仅关注饮食内容或特殊补充营养计划(妇女、婴儿和儿童)或补充营养援助计划作为干预措施的研究。
值得注意的是,有 3 位作者对摘要和全文进行了筛选,以确定是否符合纳入标准。最终队列纳入了 5 项研究。此外,有 3 位作者独立地从每篇文章中提取数据,并使用推荐分级、评估、发展和评估(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations)和美国国立卫生研究院研究质量评估工具(National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tools)评估研究质量。
总体而言,纳入了 5 项描述孕期食品不安全干预措施的研究。研究设计包括前瞻性队列研究(n=1)和回顾性队列研究(n=4)。干预措施的类型存在异质性,其中 3 项使用了食品券,1 项侧重于营养和食物管理教育的团体产前服务,1 项使用了食品联系计划。大多数研究(4 项[80%])报告了患者报告的结果(例如,食物安全水平和项目利用率),其中 2 项研究检测了与妊娠相关的结局(即血糖水平、血压和早产),2 项研究检测了营养结局。这些干预措施与改善食物不安全水平、降低早产几率和改善血压趋势相关;研究结果显示,项目利用率为 56%至 81%。所有研究的研究质量均为中等到低,内部有效性为良好到中等。
尽管针对孕期食品不安全问题的基于医疗保健的干预措施的数据有限,但已确定的少数研究表明,这些干预措施可能会影响妊娠结局。更好地了解当地食品不安全的范围和背景,以及社区组织在该领域文献中未涵盖的努力,可以帮助为针对孕期食品获取的干预措施的制定提供信息。