• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单组件与双组件翻修全膝关节置换术的临床和功能结果比较。

Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes in One versus Two Component Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Diamond Health Care Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S275-S280. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.047. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.047
PMID:36739924
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revisions of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) may require revision of one or both tibial and femoral components. Our purpose was to examine the clinical and functional outcomes in 1- versus 2-component TKA revisions.

METHODS

We identified 92 1-component (tibial or femoral) revisions at a single center. Our inclusion criteria were isolated revision of the tibial or femoral components with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The included cases were matched 1:2 with a control group of 2-component revisions (tibial and femoral) by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and indication for revision. We collected demographics, complications, operative times, any subsequent rerevisions, and functional outcome scores.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for the 1- and 2-component revision groups were 10 years (range, 3 to 17) and 8 years (range, 2 to 18), respectively. The most common complication after rerevision in both groups was stiffness at 9 of 92 (9.8%) and 9 of 170 (5.3%) in the 1- and 2-component groups, respectively (P = .20). The overall complication prevalence in the 1- and 2- component revision groups was similar 20 of 92 (22%) and 35 of 170 (21%), respectively (P = .87). Subsequent rerevisions for any indication were encountered in 12 of 92 (13.0%) of the 1-component and 18 of 170 (11%) in the 2-component groups (P = .69). There was no statistical difference in survivorship or functional outcomes scores between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that isolated revision of a single TKA component is an acceptable option, with comparable functional outcomes, complications, and survivorships when compared with both-component revision. As such, a 1-component revision should be considered where appropriate.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKA)的翻修可能需要对一个或两个胫骨和股骨部件进行翻修。我们的目的是研究单组件与双组件 TKA 翻修的临床和功能结果。

方法

我们在一家单中心确定了 92 例单组件(胫骨或股骨)翻修。我们的纳入标准为胫骨或股骨组件的孤立性翻修,随访时间至少 2 年。符合条件的病例按年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分和翻修指征,与 2 组件(胫骨和股骨)对照组 1:2 匹配。我们收集了患者的人口统计学资料、并发症、手术时间、任何后续再次翻修和功能结果评分。

结果

1 组件和 2 组件翻修组的中位随访时间分别为 10 年(范围,3 至 17 年)和 8 年(范围,2 至 18 年)。两组中最常见的再次翻修后并发症均为僵硬,分别为 92 例中的 9 例(9.8%)和 170 例中的 9 例(5.3%)(P=0.20)。1 组件和 2 组件翻修组的总体并发症发生率相似,分别为 92 例中的 20 例(22%)和 170 例中的 35 例(21%)(P=0.87)。因任何原因再次翻修的病例分别为 92 例中的 12 例(13.0%)和 170 例中的 18 例(11%)(P=0.69)。两组在生存率或功能结果评分方面无统计学差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,单 TKA 组件的孤立性翻修是一种可接受的选择,与双组件翻修相比,具有相似的功能结果、并发症和生存率。因此,在适当情况下应考虑单组件翻修。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes in One versus Two Component Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty.单组件与双组件翻修全膝关节置换术的临床和功能结果比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S275-S280. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.047. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial.全膝关节置换术中运动学与机械对线在10年临床或影像学结果上无差异:一项随机试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):140-149. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003193. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
4
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
What Is the Survivorship of TKA With a Twin-peg or Spikes-and-keel Cementless Implant Compared With Cemented? A Registry-based Cohort Study.与骨水泥型全膝关节置换术(TKA)相比,双柄或带钉-龙骨非骨水泥型植入物的TKA生存率如何?一项基于注册登记的队列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1288-1298. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003385.
6
Robotic Assistance Is Not Associated With Decreased Early Revisions in Cementless TKA: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry.机器人辅助与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术早期翻修率降低无关:来自美国关节置换登记处的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):431-438. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003330. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
7
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.活动轴承与固定轴承假体用于骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者后交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换术后功能状态的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD003130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003130.pub3.
8
What Are the Complications, Reconstruction Survival, and Functional Outcomes of Modular Prosthesis and Allograft-prosthesis Composite for Proximal Femur Reconstruction in Children With Primary Bone Tumors?对于原发性骨肿瘤患儿的股骨近端重建,模块化假体及同种异体骨-假体复合物的并发症、重建存活率及功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):455-469. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003245. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
9
Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.关节置换外科医生的修正率与术后患者报告的结果测量评分相关吗?来自澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):98-112. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002737. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
10
Outpatient Revision TKA Does Not Increase Incidence of Repeat Revision or Medical and Surgical Complications Compared With Inpatient Revision TKA.与住院全膝关节置换翻修术相比,门诊全膝关节置换翻修术不会增加再次翻修的发生率或内科及外科并发症的发生率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1302-7. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003386.

引用本文的文献

1
Isolated aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive 10-year review of partial vs. total component revisions.全膝关节置换术后单纯无菌性松动:10 年全/部分假体翻修的综合比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07925-w.
2
Can Isolated Tibial Component Revision Be an Alternative to Isolated Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty?在全膝关节置换术中,单纯胫骨部件翻修能否替代单纯胫骨部件无菌性松动?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(2):136-138. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.71428.3338.
3
"Metal-bone" scaffold for accelerated peri-implant endosseous healing.
用于加速种植体周围骨内愈合的“金属-骨”支架
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jan 10;11:1334072. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1334072. eCollection 2023.