Durunna Obioha, Carroll Jeffery A, Dailey Jeff W, Damiran Daalkhaijav, Larson Kathy A, Timsit Edouard, Parsons Rex, Manafiazar Ghader, Lardner Herbert A
Department of Applied Research, Lakeland College, Vermilion, AB, Canada.
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 19;14:1026601. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1026601. eCollection 2023.
This 2-year study evaluated differences in circadian parameters obtained from measures of core body temperatures using telemetric reticulo-rumen and rectal devices during two winter feeding regimes in western Canada. The study also estimated phenotypic correlations and genetic parameters associated with circadian parameters and other production traits in each feeding regime. Each year, 80 weaned steer calves (initial age: 209 ± 11 days; BW: 264 ± 20 kg) from the same cohort were tested over two successive regimes, Fall-Winter (FW) and Winter-Spring (WS) at Lanigan, Saskatchewan, Canada. The steers received forage-based rations in both regimes where the individual feed intake was measured with automatic feeding units. During the trial, the reticulo-rumen (RTMP) and rectal (RCT) temperatures were simultaneously measured every 5 min using telemetric devices. These were used to calculate the circadian parameters (Midline Estimating Statistic Of Rhythms, amplitude, and acrophase/peak time) for both temperature measures. Growth and efficiency performance traits were also determined for all steers. Each steer was assigned into inefficient, neutral, and efficient classes based on the SD of the residual feed intake (RFI), residual gain (RG), and residual intake and gain (RIG) within each year and feeding regime. Higher ( < 0.0003) RTMP and rectal temperature MESORs were observed in the Fall-Winter compared to the Winter-Spring regime. While the two test regimes were different ( < 0.05) for the majority of the RTMP or RCT temperature parameters, they did not differ ( > 0.10) with the production efficiency profiles. The heritability estimates were higher in FW (0.78 ± 0.18 vs. 0.56 ± 0.26) than WS (0.50 ± 0.18 vs. 0.47 ± 0.22) for the rumen and rectal MESORs, respectively. There were positive genetic correlations between the two regimes for the RTMP (0.69 ± 0.21) and RCT (0.32 ± 0.59). There was a negative correlation ( < 0.001) between body temperature and ambient temperature. The high heritability estimates and genetic correlations for rumen and rectal temperature parameters demonstrate their potential as beef genetic improvement tools of economic traits associated with the parameters. However, there are limited practical implications of using only the core-body temperature as a proxy for production efficiency traits for beef steers during winter.
这项为期两年的研究评估了在加拿大西部两种冬季饲养模式下,使用遥测瘤网和直肠装置测量核心体温所获得的昼夜节律参数的差异。该研究还估计了每种饲养模式下与昼夜节律参数及其他生产性状相关的表型相关性和遗传参数。每年,从同一群体中选取80头断奶小公牛犊(初始年龄:209±11天;体重:264±20千克),在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省拉尼根连续两个饲养模式下进行测试,即秋冬(FW)和冬春(WS)模式。在这两种模式下,小公牛均采食以草料为主的日粮,个体采食量通过自动饲喂装置测量。在试验期间,使用遥测装置每5分钟同时测量瘤网(RTMP)和直肠(RCT)温度。这些数据用于计算两种温度测量的昼夜节律参数(节律中线估计统计量、振幅和峰相位/峰值时间)。还测定了所有小公牛的生长和效率性能性状。根据每年和每种饲养模式下的剩余采食量(RFI)、剩余增重(RG)以及剩余采食量和增重(RIG)的标准差,将每头小公牛分为低效、中性和高效类别。与冬春模式相比,秋冬模式下观察到更高(<0.0003)的RTMP和直肠温度MESORs。虽然两种测试模式在大多数RTMP或RCT温度参数上存在差异(<0.05),但在生产效率概况方面并无差异(>0.10)。瘤胃和直肠MESORs的遗传力估计值在FW模式下(分别为0.78±0.18和0.56±0.26)高于WS模式(分别为0.50±0.18和0.47±0.22)。两种模式下RTMP(0.69±0.21)和RCT(0.32±0.59)之间存在正遗传相关性。体温与环境温度之间存在负相关(<0.001)。瘤胃和直肠温度参数的高遗传力估计值和遗传相关性表明它们作为与这些参数相关的牛肉经济性状遗传改良工具的潜力。然而,在冬季仅将核心体温作为肉牛生产效率性状的替代指标,实际应用有限。