• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于高保真模拟飞行的民航客机舒适性评估

Cabin aircraft comfort evaluation over high fidelity simulated flight.

作者信息

Esposito Antonio, Orlando Calogero, Alaimo Andrea

机构信息

Cittadella Universitaria, 194100 Enna, Italy Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kore University of Enna.

出版信息

CEAS Aeronaut J. 2023;14(2):491-508. doi: 10.1007/s13272-023-00640-7. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1007/s13272-023-00640-7
PMID:36743353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9882742/
Abstract

The primary purpose of this paper is to investigate the possibility of using a Full Flight Simulator (FFS) as an experimental setup for passengers' comfort analysis. Results based on subjective measurements are thus presented to assess comfort levels experienced during a simulated flight. A preliminary investigation has been conducted on a sample of 125 candidates to gain insight into the elements influencing the comfort level perceived based on the participants' actual flight experience; this suggested that the seat configuration is of great importance. Then, the experiment carried out by means of the FFS have been conducted on a reduced sample of 20 candidates for economic and organizational reasons. The behaviour of the 65% of the candidates has been analysed in a seating configuration comparable to the seat of a business-class aircraft. While the experience of the remaining 35% has been studied in an economy-type seat arrangement. Although the main variable under consideration was the seat, several environmental parameters were also considered during the experimental tests to evaluate their effects on perceived comfort level. During each simulated flight, passengers have been subjected to different levels of light intensity, noise, temperature and vibration associated with the different flight phases. Subjective data were collected using a questionnaire concerning every parameter and submitted to the passengers for each flight phase. The aim of varying the environmental parameters inside the cabin was to look for a relation between the subjective comfort level and each comfort parameter. In addition to perceived comfort based on the questionnaire, statistical analysis with parametric and non parametric tests revealed significant effects of environmental variables.

摘要

本文的主要目的是研究使用全飞行模拟器(FFS)作为乘客舒适度分析实验装置的可能性。因此,本文呈现了基于主观测量的结果,以评估模拟飞行过程中体验到的舒适度水平。对125名候选者的样本进行了初步调查,以深入了解基于参与者实际飞行体验影响感知舒适度水平的因素;这表明座椅配置非常重要。然后,由于经济和组织方面的原因,通过FFS对20名候选者的缩减样本进行了实验。65%的候选者的行为是在与商务舱飞机座椅相当的座椅配置下进行分析的。而其余35%的体验是在经济舱类型的座椅布局中进行研究的。虽然所考虑的主要变量是座椅,但在实验测试期间也考虑了几个环境参数,以评估它们对感知舒适度水平的影响。在每次模拟飞行中,乘客都受到与不同飞行阶段相关的不同水平的光照强度、噪音、温度和振动的影响。使用关于每个参数的问卷收集主观数据,并在每个飞行阶段提交给乘客。改变机舱内环境参数的目的是寻找主观舒适度水平与每个舒适度参数之间的关系。除了基于问卷的感知舒适度外,参数和非参数测试的统计分析揭示了环境变量的显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/2ac0d11e4149/13272_2023_640_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/9ec4d48505d0/13272_2023_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/8b05ded3e34e/13272_2023_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/8d500f8628c9/13272_2023_640_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/a86d3e7472bb/13272_2023_640_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/cecdc5754669/13272_2023_640_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/9dcdc510141c/13272_2023_640_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/70e4976587c5/13272_2023_640_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/958be2792082/13272_2023_640_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/5f493cf705cb/13272_2023_640_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/ee1f4fc5af78/13272_2023_640_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/2ac0d11e4149/13272_2023_640_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/9ec4d48505d0/13272_2023_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/8b05ded3e34e/13272_2023_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/8d500f8628c9/13272_2023_640_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/a86d3e7472bb/13272_2023_640_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/cecdc5754669/13272_2023_640_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/9dcdc510141c/13272_2023_640_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/70e4976587c5/13272_2023_640_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/958be2792082/13272_2023_640_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/5f493cf705cb/13272_2023_640_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/ee1f4fc5af78/13272_2023_640_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7d/9882742/2ac0d11e4149/13272_2023_640_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cabin aircraft comfort evaluation over high fidelity simulated flight.基于高保真模拟飞行的民航客机舒适性评估
CEAS Aeronaut J. 2023;14(2):491-508. doi: 10.1007/s13272-023-00640-7. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Effects of aircraft cabin noise on passenger comfort.飞机客舱噪声对旅客舒适度的影响。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(10):1252-65. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.703698. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
3
Posture, movement, and aircraft passengers: An investigation into factors influencing in-flight discomfort.姿势、运动和飞机乘客:影响飞行不适因素的调查。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S183-S195. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208016.
4
Attitudes towards personal and shared space during the flight.飞行过程中对个人空间和共享空间的态度。
Work. 2016 Jul 25;54(4):981-7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162346.
5
Seat pitch and comfort of a staggered seat configuration.交错式座位配置的座位间距和舒适度。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S151-S159. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208014.
6
Effect of airplane passenger seat armrest height on human neck comfort when using a smartphone.飞机乘客座位扶手高度对使用智能手机时人体颈部舒适度的影响。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022 Apr 11;35(2):199-208. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01874. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
7
Aircraft seating comfort: the influence of seat pitch on passengers' well-being.飞机座位舒适度:座椅间距对乘客福祉的影响。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4936-42. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0789-4936.
8
Passenger evaluation of the optimum balance between fresh air supply and humidity from 7-h exposures in a simulated aircraft cabin.乘客对模拟飞机客舱中7小时暴露期间新鲜空气供应与湿度之间最佳平衡的评估。
Indoor Air. 2007 Apr;17(2):92-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00458.x.
9
The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin.乘客舒适体验的主题结构及其与机舱环境特征的关系。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(6):801-15. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.899632. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
10
Passenger thermal comfort and behavior: a field investigation in commercial aircraft cabins.乘客的热舒适度与行为:商用飞机客舱的实地调查
Indoor Air. 2017 Jan;27(1):94-103. doi: 10.1111/ina.12294. Epub 2016 Mar 31.