• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

避免侵入性操作中的可避免医疗错误:基于事实 - 一项 NHS 员工调查。

AVOIDable medical errors in invasive procedures: Facts on the ground - An NHS staff survey.

机构信息

Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK.

Royal London Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(3):189-206. doi: 10.3233/JRS-220055.

DOI:10.3233/JRS-220055
PMID:36744348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Never Events represent a serious problem with a high burden on healthcare providers' facilities. Despite introducing various safety checklists and precautions, many Never Events are reported yearly.

OBJECTIVE

This survey aims to assess awareness and compliance with the safety standards and obtain recommendations from the National Health Service (NHS) staff on preventative measures.

METHODS

An online survey of 45 questions has been conducted directed at NHS staff involved in invasive procedures. The questions were designed to assess the level of awareness, training and education delivered to the staff on patient safety. Moreover, we designed a set of focused questions to assess compliance with the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs) guidance. Open questions were added to encourage the staff to give practical recommendations on tackling and preventing these incidents. Invitations were sent through social media, and the survey was kept live from 20/11/2021 to 23/04/2022.

RESULTS

Out of 700 invitations sent, 75 completed the survey (10.7%). 96% and 94.67% were familiar with the terms Never Events and near-miss, respectively. However, 52% and 36.49% were aware of National and Local Safety Standards for Invasive procedures (NatSSIPs-LocSSIPs), respectively. 28 (37.33%) had training on preventing medical errors. 48 (64%) believe that training on safety checklists should be delivered during undergraduate education. Fourteen (18.67%) had experiences when the checklists failed to prevent medical errors. 53 (70.67%) have seen the operating list or the consent forms containing abbreviations. Thirty-three (44%) have a failed counting reconciliation algorithm. NHS staff emphasised the importance of multi-level checks, utilisation of specific checklists, patient involvement in the safety checks, adequate staffing, avoidance of staff change in the middle of a procedure and change of list order, and investment in training and education on patient safety.

CONCLUSION

This survey showed a low awareness of some of the principal patient safety aspects and poor compliance with NatSSIPs recommendations. Checklists fail on some occasions to prevent medical errors. Process redesign creating a safe environment, and enhancing a safety culture could be the key. The study presented the recommendations of the staff on preventative measures.

摘要

背景

“永不事件”是医疗保健提供者设施面临的严重问题,具有较高负担。尽管引入了各种安全清单和预防措施,但每年仍有许多“永不事件”发生。

目的

本调查旨在评估 NHS 员工对安全标准的认知和遵守情况,并就预防措施征求 NHS 员工的建议。

方法

对参与侵入性程序的 NHS 员工进行了一项 45 个问题的在线调查。这些问题旨在评估向员工提供的患者安全意识、培训和教育水平。此外,我们设计了一套重点问题,以评估对国家安全标准(NatSSIPs)指南的遵守情况。还添加了开放性问题,以鼓励员工就解决和预防这些事件提供实际建议。通过社交媒体发送邀请,调查从 2021 年 11 月 20 日至 2022 年 4 月 23 日保持开放状态。

结果

在发出的 700 份邀请中,有 75 人完成了调查(10.7%)。分别有 96%和 94.67%的人熟悉“永不事件”和“险些事件”这两个术语。然而,分别有 52%和 36.49%的人熟悉国家和地方侵入性程序安全标准(NatSSIPs-LocSSIPs)。28 人(37.33%)接受过预防医疗差错的培训。48 人(64%)认为应该在本科教育期间提供安全清单培训。14 人(18.67%)在清单未预防医疗差错时经历过。53 人(70.67%)看到过包含缩写的手术清单或同意书。33 人(44%)的计数核对算法失败。NHS 员工强调了多层次检查、使用特定清单、患者参与安全检查、充足的人员配置、避免在手术中途更换人员以及改变清单顺序的重要性,还强调了在患者安全培训方面的投资。

结论

本调查显示,一些主要的患者安全方面的认知度较低,并且对 NatSSIPs 建议的遵守情况较差。清单有时未能预防医疗差错。创建安全环境的流程设计变更和增强安全文化可能是关键。该研究提出了员工对预防措施的建议。

相似文献

1
AVOIDable medical errors in invasive procedures: Facts on the ground - An NHS staff survey.避免侵入性操作中的可避免医疗错误:基于事实 - 一项 NHS 员工调查。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(3):189-206. doi: 10.3233/JRS-220055.
2
Implementation of "local safety standards for invasive procedures (LocSSIPs)" policy: not merely a tick-box exercise in patient safety.实施“侵入性操作地方安全标准(LocSSIPs)”政策:不仅仅是患者安全方面的一项打勾式任务。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 May;58(4):421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.024. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
How to create local safety standards for invasive procedures (LocSSIPs) by engaging the team in patient safety.如何通过让团队参与患者安全来制定侵入性操作的本地安全标准(LocSSIPs)。
Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.51.
5
The evolution of patient safety procedures in an oral surgery department.口腔外科部门的患者安全程序演变。
Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 11;226(1):32-38. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.5.
6
Common preventable errors in hand surgery: Analysis of NHS never events data and a proposed safety checklist.手部外科常见可预防的错误:NHS 无预警事件数据的分析及一份安全检查表的建议。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(3):169-178. doi: 10.3233/JRS-220030.
7
Surgical safety checklists and understanding of Never Events, in UK and Irish dental hospitals.英国和爱尔兰牙科医院的手术安全检查表及对严重可避免事件的认知
Br Dent J. 2016 Jun 10;220(11):585-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.414.
8
Practical implementation of quality improvement for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.高剂量率近距离放射治疗质量改进的实际实施
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
9
Introducing standardized "readbacks" to improve patient safety in surgery: a prospective survey in 92 providers at a public safety-net hospital.引入标准化“复述”以提高手术患者安全:对一家公共安全网医院的92名医护人员进行的前瞻性调查。
BMC Surg. 2012 Jun 19;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-8.
10
When a checklist is not enough: How to improve them and what else is needed.当检查表不够用时:如何改进它们以及还需要什么。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;152(2):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Jan 19.