Suppr超能文献

碳二亚胺(EDC)和壳聚糖交联剂是否会影响不同类型复合树脂水门汀黏固的玻璃纤维桩在根管牙本质中的长期效果?

Can Carbodiimide (EDC) and Chitosan Cross-linking Agents Effect the Longevity of Fiberglass Posts Luted with Different Types of Composite Cements to Root Dentin?

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2023 Feb 6;25:39-50. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3868623.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of carbodiimide (EDC) and chitosan (CHI) on the enzymatic activity (EA) and bond strength (BS) of different composite cements to root dentin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety (90) maxillary canines were sectioned, standardizing the length of the roots. The roots were endodontically treated, prepared, divided into 3 groups according to dentin treatment (distilled water [DW], CHI 0.2 wt%, or EDC 0.5M), and further subdivided into 3 subgroups according to composite cement (RelyX ARC [3M Oral Care], Panavia F 2.0 [Kuraray Noritaki], or RelyX U200 [3M Oral Care]). Of the slices obtained by sectioning, the most cervical of each third were subjected to a push-out test and the most apical were subjected to in-situ zymography. Half of the slices were analyzed immediately, and the other half after 6 months. The results were analyzed with ANOVA or the chi-squared test.

RESULTS

RelyX ARC showed higher BS associated with CHI, while RelyX U200 showed higher BS associated with EDC (p = 0.044). For Panavia F 2.0, the treatment did not influence BS (p > 0.05). For the cervical and middle thirds, no differences were observed between the cements, while the apical third revealed higher BS for RelyX U200 (p < 0.001). The highest percentage of adhesive-to-dentin failures was observed for Panavia F 2.0. EDC showed the lowest percentage of adhesive-to-dentin failures. According to zymographic analysis, DW and CHI showed greater fluorescence for RelyX ARC, while EDC exhibited the lowest fluorescence of all cements (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The different mechanisms of action of solutions for pre-treatment of intraradicular dentin yielded different results depending on the adhesive used. EDC resulted in higher bond strength and higher enzyme inhibition for RelyX U200, while the treatment with chitosan resulted in higher bond strength and lower enzymatic activity for RelyX ARC. Although EDC and chitosan treatments did not influence the bond strength for Panavia F 2.0, both resulted in higher enzyme inhibition for this composite cement.

摘要

目的

评估碳二亚胺(EDC)和壳聚糖(CHI)对不同复合树脂水门汀与根管牙本质之间黏接强度(BS)和酶活性(EA)的影响。

材料与方法

90 颗上颌尖牙被截成标准长度的根段,根管治疗后,按牙本质处理方式(去离子水[DW]、0.2wt%CHI 或 0.5M EDC)分为 3 组,每组再按复合树脂(RelyX ARC[3M 口腔护理]、Panavia F 2.0[Kuraray Noritaki]或 RelyX U200[3M 口腔护理])分为 3 个亚组。每组中近、远中三分之一各取 1 个根段行推出试验,根尖三分之一根段行原位酶谱分析。每 3 个根段的最近中根段行黏接强度测试,其中一半即刻分析,另一半于 6 个月后分析。采用方差分析或卡方检验对结果进行分析。

结果

RelyX ARC 与 CHI 联合时黏接强度最高,而 RelyX U200 与 EDC 联合时黏接强度最高(p = 0.044)。Panavia F 2.0 组不同处理方式间黏接强度无差异(p > 0.05)。近中、中三分之一黏接强度无差异,根尖三分之一黏接强度 RelyX U200 最高(p < 0.001)。Panavia F 2.0 组的牙本质-树脂黏接失败率最高,EDC 组最低。酶谱分析显示 DW 和 CHI 处理时 RelyX ARC 荧光最强,所有水门汀中 EDC 荧光最弱(p > 0.05)。

结论

不同预处理溶液对牙本质的作用机制不同,导致使用不同黏接树脂时黏接强度和酶抑制效果不同。EDC 处理时 RelyX U200 黏接强度最高,酶抑制效果最强,而 CHI 处理时 RelyX ARC 黏接强度最高,酶活性最低。EDC 和 CHI 处理虽然对 Panavia F 2.0 黏接强度无影响,但均使该复合树脂的酶抑制效果增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ea/11734253/373635ad0583/jad-25-39-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验