A meta-analysis and systematic review of the comparison of laparoscopic ablation to percutaneous ablation for hepatic malignancies.

BACKGROUND

The optimal access for thermal ablation of the liver has not been evaluated in the literature for the laparoscopic versus percutaneous techniques. The aim of this manuscript was to determine the optimal ablation technique and patient selection for hepatic malignancies by comparing the efficacy and recurrence-free survival of laparoscopic and percutaneous thermal ablation.

METHODS

A detailed literature search was made in PubMed, Web of Science, Google scholar, and EMBASE for related research publications. The data were extracted and assessed by two reviewers independently. Analysis of pooled data was performed, and Odds Ratio (OR) or Hazard Ratio (HR) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated and summarized respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles were included with 1916 ablation patients. Laparoscopic ablation success (Median 100%) was found to be higher than percutaneous ablation success (median 89.4%) (p = ns). There was a higher percentage of both local and non-local hepatic recurrence in the patients treated with percutaneous ablation versus laparoscopic ablation. Meta-analysis indicated no difference in the adjusted hazard rate of recurrence by procedure type (p = 0.94). Laparoscopic ablation had a higher percentage of complications compared to percutaneous ablation (median lap 14.5% vs. perc 3.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

While laparoscopic and percutaneous ablation are both effective interventions for hepatic malignancies, laparoscopic ablation was found to have improved ablation success and less local and non-local hepatic recurrence compared to percutaneous ablation.