• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于网络的计算器,结合了老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和蒂尔堡虚弱指数(TFI),可预测年轻老年胃癌患者的术后并发症。

A web-based calculator combining Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) predicts postoperative complications among young elderly patients with gastric cancer.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 Mar;23(3):205-212. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14544. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1111/ggi.14544
PMID:36746414
Abstract

AIM

Nutritional status and frailty are significant indicators reflecting physiological reserve. We sought to establish and validate a web-based calculator containing the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) together with general clinical information to predict total complications among elderly patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of 582 elderly patients with gastric cancer in a tertiary hospital in China. Nutritional status and frailty were assessed by the GNRI and the TFI, respectively. The nomogram was built and further converted into a web-based calculator. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the discrimination of the nomogram. Calibration was assessed using the calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test via the bootstrap resampling procedure. The decision curve analyses (DCAs) were employed to quantify the net benefits of a certain threshold probability for assessing the clinical values.

RESULTS

The GNRI (odds ratio [OR], 0.921; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.895-0.949; P < 0.001), the TFI (OR, 1.243; 95% CI, 1.113-1.386; P < 0.001), surgical approach (OR, 1.913; 95% CI, 1.073-3.408; P = 0.028) and comorbidity (OR = 1.599, 95%CI = 1.028-2.486, P = 0.037) were independently associated with total complications. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: training cohort, 0.735; validation cohort, 0.777) and calibration (P = 0.135). The DCA curves of the nomogram also showed good positive net benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The web-based calculator incorporating the GNRI, the TFI, surgical approach, and comorbidity could successfully predict total complications among elderly patients with gastric cancer with good accuracy in a convenient manner. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 205-212.

摘要

目的

营养状况和虚弱是反映生理储备的重要指标。我们旨在建立和验证一个包含老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和蒂尔堡虚弱指数(TFI)以及一般临床信息的网络计算器,以预测老年胃癌患者的总并发症。

方法

这是一项在中国一家三级医院进行的老年胃癌患者的前瞻性队列研究。营养状况和虚弱分别通过 GNRI 和 TFI 进行评估。建立了列线图,并进一步转化为网络计算器。通过bootstrap 重采样程序进行接收者操作特征分析,以评估列线图的区分度。通过校准曲线和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验评估校准。通过决策曲线分析(DCA)来量化评估特定阈值概率的临床价值的净收益。

结果

GNRI(比值比 [OR],0.921;95%置信区间 [CI],0.895-0.949;P<0.001)、TFI(OR,1.243;95%CI,1.113-1.386;P<0.001)、手术方式(OR,1.913;95%CI,1.073-3.408;P=0.028)和合并症(OR=1.599,95%CI=1.028-2.486,P=0.037)与总并发症独立相关。列线图具有良好的区分度(训练队列的受试者工作特征曲线下面积:0.735;验证队列:0.777)和校准(P=0.135)。列线图的 DCA 曲线也显示出良好的正净效益。

结论

该网络计算器纳入 GNRI、TFI、手术方式和合并症,可方便地以较高的准确性预测老年胃癌患者的总并发症。老年医学与老年病学杂志 2023;23:205-212。

相似文献

1
A web-based calculator combining Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) predicts postoperative complications among young elderly patients with gastric cancer.一种基于网络的计算器,结合了老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和蒂尔堡虚弱指数(TFI),可预测年轻老年胃癌患者的术后并发症。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 Mar;23(3):205-212. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14544. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Comparing the Performance of Different Instruments for Diagnosing Frailty and Predicting Adverse Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer.比较不同工具在老年胃癌患者中诊断衰弱及预测不良结局的性能
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(10):1241-1247. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1701-8.
3
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Nutritional Risk Based on Frailty Scores in Older Stroke Patients.基于衰弱评分的老年脑卒中患者营养风险预测列线图的建立与验证。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 May 18;36(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02689-0.
4
Can the Tilburg Frailty Indicator predict post-operative quality of recovery in patients with gynecologic cancer? A prospective cohort study.蒂尔堡虚弱指数能否预测妇科癌症患者术后恢复质量?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 May 1;33(5):761-769. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003822.
5
A dynamic online nomogram for predicting the heterogeneity trajectories of frailty among elderly gastric cancer survivors.用于预测老年胃癌幸存者脆弱性异质性轨迹的动态在线列线图。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104716. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Association Between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Frailty in Older Hospitalized Patients.老年住院患者营养风险指数与衰弱的关系。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Jun 28;16:1241-1249. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S313827. eCollection 2021.
7
Prediction of postoperative complications and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy using preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in elderly gastric cancer patients.应用术前老年营养风险指数预测老年胃癌患者腹腔镜胃切除术后并发症和生存情况。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1202-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07487-7. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to Predict Surgical Site Infection Among Gynecologic Oncology Patients.基于老年营养风险指数的列线图预测妇科肿瘤患者手术部位感染的开发与验证
Front Nutr. 2022 Apr 27;9:864761. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.864761. eCollection 2022.
9
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index can predict postoperative delirium and hospital length of stay in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.老年营养风险指数可预测行非心脏手术的老年患者术后谵妄和住院时间。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Aug;20(8):759-764. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13963. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, a predictive assessment tool, for postoperative complications after abdominal surgery: A prospective multicenter cohort study.老年营养风险指数,一种预测性评估工具,用于腹部手术后的术后并发症:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Sep;19(9):924-929. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13750. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The prealbumin-CD19 index predicts surgical survival in patients with GC.前白蛋白-CD19指数可预测胃癌患者的手术生存率。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13715-x.
2
Preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index predicts prognosis and postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.术前老年营养风险指数可预测老年非心脏手术患者的预后及术后并发症:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05667-x.
3
Development and validation of a preoperative prediction model for geriatric emergency general surgery.
老年急诊普通外科手术术前预测模型的开发与验证
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 20;410(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03610-1.
4
Frailty is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Older Adults with Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.衰弱是老年腰椎退行性疾病患者术后并发症的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Jun 19;19:1117-1126. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S462731. eCollection 2024.
5
Inflammatory status predicts prognosis in patients with gastric cancer with early pyloric stenosis who underwent radical resection: A propensity score‑matching analysis.炎症状态可预测接受根治性切除的早期幽门狭窄胃癌患者的预后:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jun 3;28(2):355. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14488. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Comparison of three frailty scales for prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus following major abdominal surgery in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study.三种衰弱量表预测老年患者大腹部手术后长时间术后肠梗阻的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02391-6.
7
Frailty and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.胃癌患者的衰弱与长期生存:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 21;13:1239781. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1239781. eCollection 2023.
8
The Prognostic Value of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Evaluating Rehospitalization and One-Year Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure.老年营养风险指数在评估心力衰竭患者再住院率及一年死亡率中的预后价值
Cureus. 2023 Aug 31;15(8):e44460. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44460. eCollection 2023 Aug.