Lung Disease Cancer, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 6;13(2):e052556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052556.
Describe characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Retrospective chart review study defining several cohorts: (1) limited-stage disease (LD) SCLC initiating 1L therapy (1 L LD-SCLC), (2) extensive-stage disease (ED) SCLC initiating 1L therapy (1L ED-SCLC) and (3) patients initiating 2L therapy.
39 physicians (medical oncologists, thoracic oncologists and/or pulmonologists) from France, Italy and the UK.
Patients >18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of LD-SCLC or ED-SCLC and a full oncology medical history. Patients included initiated a 1L (2013-2015) or 2L (2013-2016) treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy-RT).
Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
231 patients in 1L LD-SCLC, 308 in 1L ED-SCLC and 225 with relapse/refractory SCLC initiating 2L treatment were included. The proportion of men was higher across all groups (56.8% to 68.5%) and mean age at time of diagnosis was 66.0 and 65.4 years in 1L LD-SCLC and 2L ED-SCLC cohorts. The majority of patients in LD-SCLC 1L group received chemotherapy with RT (76.2%). Patients initiating 2L therapy predominantly received chemotherapy alone (79.6%).Median OS in 1 L patients was 17.3 months in LD-SCLC and 8.8 months in ED-SCLC. Median PFS was 11.6 months in LD-SCLC and 6.1 months in ED-SCLC patients. Median OS in patients initiating 2L treatment was 6.6 months. OS from start of 2L treatment was lower in patients initially diagnosed with ED (5.1 months) than in patients initially diagnosed with LD (9.3 months) (p<0.0001). OS and PFS were assessed from the start of 1L or 2L therapy, depending on the cohort.
Despite the availability of a high number of treatments and combinations, the prognosis of SCLC is still unsatisfactory, especially for those patients diagnosed with ED-SCLC, indicating high unmet need in this patient population.
描述小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的特征、治疗模式和临床结局。
回顾性图表审查研究,定义了几个队列:(1)局限性疾病(LD)SCLC 患者开始 1 线治疗(1L LD-SCLC),(2)广泛期疾病(ED)SCLC 患者开始 1 线治疗(1L ED-SCLC),以及(3)开始 2 线治疗的患者。
法国、意大利和英国的 39 名医生(肿瘤内科医生、胸部肿瘤医生和/或肺科医生)。
年龄>18 岁,确诊为 LD-SCLC 或 ED-SCLC 且有完整肿瘤病史的患者。包括开始 1 线(2013-2015 年)或 2 线(2013-2016 年)治疗(化疗和/或放疗-RT)的患者。
总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。
纳入了 231 名 1L LD-SCLC 患者、308 名 1L ED-SCLC 患者和 225 名复发/难治性 SCLC 患者开始 2 线治疗。所有组中男性比例均较高(56.8%至 68.5%),1L LD-SCLC 和 2L ED-SCLC 队列的诊断时平均年龄为 66.0 岁和 65.4 岁。LD-SCLC 1L 组的大多数患者接受化疗联合 RT(76.2%)。开始 2 线治疗的患者主要接受单独化疗(79.6%)。1L 患者的中位 OS 为 LD-SCLC 患者 17.3 个月,ED-SCLC 患者 8.8 个月。LD-SCLC 患者的中位 PFS 为 11.6 个月,ED-SCLC 患者为 6.1 个月。开始 2 线治疗的患者的中位 OS 为 6.6 个月。从开始 2 线治疗开始,最初诊断为 ED 的患者(5.1 个月)的 OS 低于最初诊断为 LD 的患者(9.3 个月)(p<0.0001)。OS 和 PFS 根据队列从 1L 或 2L 治疗开始进行评估。
尽管有大量的治疗方法和联合治疗可供选择,但 SCLC 的预后仍然不理想,尤其是对于那些最初诊断为 ED-SCLC 的患者,表明该患者人群存在高度未满足的需求。