Intermediate-weighted MRI with fat suppression (IW-FS): diagnostic performance for bone marrow edema and erosion detection in axial spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow edema (BME) and erosion of the sacroiliac joint are both key lesions for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To qualitatively and quantitatively compare intermediate-weighted MRI with fat suppression (IW-FS) with T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery (T2-STIR) in assessment of sacroiliac BME and erosion in axSpA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients aged 18-60 years with axSpA were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent a 3.0-T MRI examination of the sacroiliac joints. Para-coronal IW-FS, T2-STIR, and T1-weighted (T1W) images were acquired. BME and erosion were scored by two readers in consensus on IW-FS and STIR using a modified Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system. Consensus scores on T1WI were used as the reference for erosion. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for BME.

RESULTS

In total, 49 patients (mean age=33.4 ± 7.6 years) were included. More patients were scored as having BME on T2-STIR (36 vs. 29,  = 0.016). SPARCC-BME score on IW-FS was lower than that acquired on T2-STIR (mean, 11.5 vs. 14.7,  = 0.002). SNR and CNR of BME were both lower on IW-FS than on T2-STIR (mean SNR, 118 vs. 218,  < 0.001; mean CNR, 44 vs. 137,  < 0.001). The sensitivity of erosion detection was higher on IW-FS (83%) than on T2-STIR (54%,  = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

IW-FS is not sufficient for BME detection using T2-STIR as the reference standard in patients with axSpA. IW-FS has a much higher sensitivity than T2-STIR for erosion detection in the sacroiliac joint.