School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Mays Cancer Center, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9857-9867. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5646. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
This study aimed to examine the effects of participant role (patient vs. partner), race (white vs. non-white), and place (less vs. more neighborhood deprivation) on health outcomes (quality of life [QOL] and symptoms) and stress-coping-related psychosocial factors (appraisals of illness and coping resources).
This descriptive study included 273 patients and their partners (dyads) who transitioned from PCa treatment to self-management. We used established, psychometrically sound measures to assess health outcomes and psychosocial factors and conducted multilevel modeling analyses.
Compared to partners, patients reported worse physical QOL; less frequent anxiety; less pain and fatigue; less bothersome hormonal problems; more bothersome urinary and sexual problems; greater self-efficacy; and more instrumental support. Compared to their white counterparts, non-white dyads reported better overall, emotional, and functional QOL; less depression; more positive appraisals, and greater self-efficacy. Compared to dyads in low ADI neighborhoods, dyads in high ADI (more deprived) neighborhoods reported worse social QOL; more bothersome urinary, sexual, and hormonal symptoms; and less interpersonal support. White patients reported the highest emotional support among all groups, while white partners reported the lowest emotional support.
Our findings underscore the need to consider social determinants of health at multiple levels when investigating PCa disparities. Considering neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors, in addition to race and role, improves our understanding of the PCa disparities in QOL, symptoms, and psychosocial factors among patients and partners. Targeted multilevel supportive care interventions should tailor to the needs of racially diverse PCa patients and partners residing in deprived neighborhoods are needed.
本研究旨在探讨参与者角色(患者与伴侣)、种族(白人与非白人)和地点(邻里剥夺程度较低与较高地区)对健康结果(生活质量[QOL]和症状)以及应激应对相关心理社会因素(疾病评估和应对资源)的影响。
本描述性研究纳入了 273 名接受前列腺癌(PCa)治疗后进入自我管理阶段的患者及其伴侣(对子)。我们使用已建立的、具有良好心理测量学特性的测量工具来评估健康结果和心理社会因素,并进行了多层次建模分析。
与伴侣相比,患者报告的生理 QOL 更差;焦虑发生频率更低;疼痛和疲劳更少;激素相关问题更轻微;尿失禁和性功能障碍问题更严重;自我效能感更高;获得的工具性支持更多。与白人患者相比,非白人患者报告的总体、情感和功能 QOL 更好;抑郁程度更低;对疾病的评价更积极,自我效能感更高。与居住在邻里剥夺程度较低地区的患者相比,居住在邻里剥夺程度较高(更贫困)地区的患者报告的社会 QOL 更差;尿失禁、性功能障碍和激素相关症状更严重;人际支持更少。在所有组别中,白人患者报告的情绪支持最高,而白人伴侣报告的情绪支持最低。
本研究结果强调了在研究 PCa 差异时,需要从多个层面考虑健康的社会决定因素。考虑邻里的社会经济因素,除种族和角色外,有助于更好地理解 PCa 患者和伴侣在 QOL、症状和心理社会因素方面的差异。需要针对居住在贫困地区的不同种族的 PCa 患者和伴侣提供有针对性的多层次支持性护理干预措施。