Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌症患者的抑郁症状管理存在差距。

Gaps in Depression Symptom Management for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2023 Oct;133(10):2638-2646. doi: 10.1002/lary.30595. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand practice patterns and identify care gaps within a large-scale depression screening program for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

This was a population-based study of adults diagnosed with a HNC between January 2007 and October 2020. Each patient was observed from time of first symptom assessment until end of study date, or death. The exposure of interest was a positive depressive symptom screen on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Outcomes of interest included psychiatry/psychology assessment, social work referral, or palliative care assessment. Cause specific hazard models with a time-varying exposure were used to investigate the exposure-outcome relationships.

RESULTS

Of 14,054 patients with HNC, 9016 (64.2%) reported depressive symptoms on at least one ESAS assessment. Within 60 days of first reporting depressive symptoms, 223 (2.7%) received a psychiatry assessment, 646 (7.9%) a social work referral, and 1131 (13.9%) a palliative care assessment. Rates of psychiatry/psychology assessment (HR 3.15 [95% CI 2.67-3.72]), social work referral (HR 1.83 [95% CI 1.64-2.02]), and palliative care assessment (HR 2.34 [95% CI 2.19-2.50]) were higher for those screening positive for depression. Certain patient populations were less likely to receive an assessment including the elderly, rural residents, and those without a prior psychiatric history.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of head and neck patients report depressive symptoms, though this triggers a referral in a small number of cases. These data highlight areas for improvement in depression screening care pathways.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2638-2646, 2023.

摘要

目的

了解大规模头颈部癌症(HNC)患者抑郁筛查计划中的实践模式并确定其中的护理差距。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

这是一项基于人群的研究,纳入了 2007 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月期间被诊断患有 HNC 的成年人。每位患者从首次症状评估到研究结束或死亡期间都被观察。感兴趣的暴露因素是 Edmonton 症状评估系统(ESAS)上的阳性抑郁症状筛查。感兴趣的结果包括精神病学/心理学评估、社会工作转介或姑息治疗评估。采用具有时变暴露的特定原因风险模型来研究暴露与结果之间的关系。

结果

在 14054 例 HNC 患者中,有 9016 例(64.2%)在至少一次 ESAS 评估中报告了抑郁症状。在首次报告抑郁症状后的 60 天内,有 223 例(2.7%)接受了精神病学评估,646 例(7.9%)接受了社会工作转介,1131 例(13.9%)接受了姑息治疗评估。筛查阳性的患者接受精神病学/心理学评估的比例(HR 3.15 [95% CI 2.67-3.72])、社会工作转介的比例(HR 1.83 [95% CI 1.64-2.02])和姑息治疗评估的比例(HR 2.34 [95% CI 2.19-2.50])更高。某些患者群体不太可能接受评估,包括老年人、农村居民和没有既往精神病史的患者。

结论

大量头颈部患者报告了抑郁症状,但这仅触发了少数病例的转介。这些数据突出了改善抑郁筛查护理途径的领域。

证据水平

  1. Laryngoscope, 133:2638-2646, 2023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验