Suppr超能文献

脑刺激对人类初级运动皮层的神经生理学后效:三种方案的假刺激对照比较。

The neurophysiological aftereffects of brain stimulation in human primary motor cortex: a Sham-controlled comparison of three protocols.

机构信息

Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2023 May 24;33(11):7061-7075. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad021.

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are non-invasive brain stimulation methods that are used to modulate cortical excitability. Whether one technique is superior to the others in achieving this outcome and whether individuals that respond to one intervention are more likely to respond to another remains largely unknown. In the present study, the neurophysiological aftereffects of three excitatory neurostimulation protocols were measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Twenty minutes of PAS at an ISI of 25 ms, anodal tDCS, 20-Hz tACS, and Sham stimulation were administered to 31 healthy adults in a repeated measures design. Compared with Sham, none of the stimulation protocols significantly modulated corticospinal excitability (input/ouput curve and slope, TMS stimulator intensity required to elicit MEPs of 1-mV amplitude) or intracortical excitability (short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, cortical silent period). Sham-corrected responder analysis estimates showed that an average of 41 (PAS), 39 (tDCS), and 39% (tACS) of participants responded to the interventions with an increase in corticospinal excitability. The present data show that three stimulation protocols believed to increase cortical excitability are associated with highly heterogenous and variable aftereffects that may explain a lack of significant group effects.

摘要

配对联想刺激 (PAS)、经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 和经颅交流电刺激 (tACS) 是用于调节皮质兴奋性的非侵入性脑刺激方法。一种技术是否优于另一种技术来实现这一结果,以及对一种干预措施有反应的个体是否更有可能对另一种干预措施有反应,在很大程度上仍然未知。在本研究中,使用经颅磁刺激 (TMS) 测量了三种兴奋性神经刺激方案的神经生理后效。在一项重复测量设计中,31 名健康成年人接受了 25ms 间隔的 PAS 20 分钟、阳极 tDCS、20Hz tACS 和假刺激。与假刺激相比,没有一种刺激方案能显著调节皮质脊髓兴奋性(输入/输出曲线和斜率、需要 TMS 刺激器强度以引出 1mV 振幅的 MEP)或皮质内兴奋性(短程和长程皮质内抑制、皮质内易化、皮质静息期)。校正后的 Sham 应答者分析估计表明,平均有 41%(PAS)、39%(tDCS)和 39%(tACS)的参与者对干预措施有反应,皮质脊髓兴奋性增加。目前的数据表明,三种被认为能增加皮质兴奋性的刺激方案与高度异质和可变的后效有关,这可能解释了缺乏显著的组间效应的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验