Suppr超能文献

面瘫患者一期 Latissimus Dorsi 神经肌蒂转移术中双重与单一神经支配技术对微笑再生活动效果的比较。

Comparison of Outcomes of Smile Reanimation Between Dual- Versus Single-Innervation Technique in Single-Stage Latissimus Dorsi Neuromuscular Transfer in Facial Paralysis Patients.

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;25(6):505-511. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0128. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

Although a dual-innervation technique has emerged in single-stage functional latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle transfer for smile reanimation, its benefits over conventional techniques have not been elucidated. To compare outcomes of dual-innervation technique with those of single-innervation. Patients with facial palsy treated with single-stage functional LD muscle transfer were identified, and categorized into two groups: single and dual innervation. Outcomes were assessed using clinical examination based on the Terzis grading system and using automated software (Emotrics). Fifty-nine patients (mean age 37.6 years; male/female 30/29) were analyzed, including 40 in single (35.1 years, 23/17) and 19 in dual-innervation group (43.0 years, 7/12), with a median follow-up of 34 months (range, 9-165) (single: 41.5, 12-165, dual: 23.0, 9-41). Tumor-related paralysis was the most common etiology in both groups (overall: 45.8%, single: 40.0%, dual: 57.9%). The dual group had a significantly higher rate of cases with Terzis grade IV or V postoperatively. In the Emotrics-based evaluation, the dual group exhibited significantly enhanced improvements in smile excursion in the dynamic state compared with the single. The degree of improvement in the resting state did not differ between groups. The dual-innervation technique might provide promising results in achieving enhanced smile excursion.

摘要

虽然在单阶段功能性背阔肌(LD)肌肉转移中出现了双重神经支配技术,但它与传统技术相比的优势尚未阐明。为了比较双重神经支配技术与单一神经支配技术的结果。确定了接受单阶段功能性 LD 肌肉转移治疗的面瘫患者,并将其分为两组:单神经和双重神经支配。使用基于 Terzis 分级系统的临床检查和自动软件(Emotrics)评估结果。分析了 59 例患者(平均年龄 37.6 岁;男/女 30/29),包括 40 例单神经(35.1 岁,23/17)和 19 例双重神经支配组(43.0 岁,7/12),中位随访时间为 34 个月(范围 9-165)(单神经:41.5,12-165,双重:23.0,9-41)。肿瘤相关的瘫痪是两组中最常见的病因(总体:45.8%,单神经:40.0%,双重:57.9%)。双重组术后出现 Terzis 分级 IV 或 V 的比例明显更高。在基于 Emotrics 的评估中,与单神经组相比,双重神经组在动态状态下的微笑幅度改善明显更大。在静止状态下,两组的改善程度没有差异。双重神经支配技术可能在实现更大的微笑幅度方面提供有希望的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验