• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狗、认识上不可辩护性和伦理否认:别让沉睡的狗主人撒谎。

Dogs, Epistemic Indefensibility and Ethical Denial: Don't Let Sleeping Dog Owners Lie.

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.

Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Mar;20(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10229-8. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11673-023-10229-8
PMID:36749536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9904516/
Abstract

In this paper I use normative analysis to explore the curious and seemingly singular phenomenon whereby some dog owners deny the physical and moral facts about a situation where it is claimed their dog harmed or irritated others. I define these as epistemic and ethical denial, respectively, and offer a tentative exploration of their implications in terms of relational autonomy and responsible behaviour in public spaces.

摘要

在本文中,我使用规范分析来探讨一个奇怪而看似独特的现象,即一些狗主人否认他们的狗伤害或激怒他人的事实,无论是身体上的还是道德上的。我分别将这些定义为认知否认和伦理否认,并就它们在公共空间中的关系自主性和负责任行为方面的含义进行了初步探讨。

相似文献

1
Dogs, Epistemic Indefensibility and Ethical Denial: Don't Let Sleeping Dog Owners Lie.狗、认识上不可辩护性和伦理否认:别让沉睡的狗主人撒谎。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Mar;20(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10229-8. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Encouraging physical activity through dog walking: why don't some owners walk with their dog?通过遛狗来鼓励身体活动:为什么有些主人不与他们的狗一起散步?
Prev Med. 2008 Feb;46(2):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
3
Will breed-specific legislation reduce dog bites?特定品种立法会减少狗咬人事件吗?
Can Vet J. 1996 Aug;37(8):478-81.
4
Dog behaviours in veterinary consultations: Part II. The relationship between the behaviours of dogs and their owners.兽医咨询中的犬类行为:第二部分。犬类行为与其主人行为之间的关系。
Vet J. 2022 Mar;281:105789. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105789. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Is your dog empathic? Developing a Dog Emotional Reactivity Survey.你的狗狗有同理心吗?开发一份犬类情绪反应调查问卷。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0170397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170397. eCollection 2017.
6
Dogs in public spaces of Buenos Aires, Argentina: Exploring patterns of the abundance of dogs, the canine faecal contamination, the behaviour of people with dogs, and its relationships with demographic/economic variables.阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯公共场所的狗:探究狗的数量模式、犬类粪便污染、带狗的人的行为及其与人口/经济变量的关系。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Oct 1;170:104713. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104713. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
7
Slower, shorter, sadder: a qualitative study exploring how dog walks change when the canine participant develops osteoarthritis.速度更慢、时间更短、情绪更低落:一项探索当犬类参与者患上骨关节炎时,狗散步如何变化的定性研究。
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Mar 10;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02293-8.
8
Changes to Adult Dog Social Behaviour during and after COVID-19 Lockdowns in England: A Qualitative Analysis of Owner Perception.英国新冠疫情封锁期间及之后成年犬社交行为的变化:对犬主认知的定性分析
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;12(13):1682. doi: 10.3390/ani12131682.
9
Sharing more than friendship--nasal colonization with coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) and co-habitation aspects of dogs and their owners.分享不只是友谊--鼻腔定植阳性葡萄球菌(CPS)和狗及其主人的共同居住方面。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035197. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
10
"": Understanding Unplanned Dog Acquisitions Amongst a Sample of Dog Owners Attending Canine Health and Welfare Community Events in the United Kingdom.:了解在英国参加犬类健康与福利社区活动的犬主样本中意外获取犬只的情况。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;11(3):605. doi: 10.3390/ani11030605.

引用本文的文献

1
"The Danger of Words": Language Games in Bioethics.“言辞的危险”:生物伦理学中的语言游戏
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Mar;20(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10248-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding autonomy relationally: toward a reconfiguration of bioethical principles.从关系角度理解自主性:迈向生物伦理原则的重新构建
J Med Philos. 2001 Aug;26(4):365-86. doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.4.365.3012.