• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仰卧位是否适合超声引导经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石?

Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2023;107(6):550-556. doi: 10.1159/000528677. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1159/000528677
PMID:36754041
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones.

CONCLUSION

US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在评估改良仰卧位下超声引导经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗复杂性肾结石的安全性和疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 8 月至 2021 年 12 月在我院接受 PCNL 治疗复杂性肾结石的患者病历。在此期间,188 例连续患者接受了超声引导下俯卧位(P 组,n=129)或改良仰卧位(S 组,n=59)PCNL。分析患者的人口统计学资料及术中、术后资料。

结果

所有患者均成功建立肾通道。两组患者的基线资料相似。S 组的肾通道数量明显多于 P 组(2.1±0.4 比 1.2±0.2,p=0.002),手术时间相似(79.1±14.6min 比 96.2±19.6min,p=0.06)。S 组术后住院时间更短(6.2±1.5d 比 10.2±1.7d,p=0.008)。两组术后血红蛋白丢失量相似(1.7±0.4g/dL 比 1.8±0.3g/dL,p=0.12)。S 组的结石清除率明显较低(57.5%比 82.7%,p<0.001)。无栓塞或感染并发症。S 组 12 例(20.3%)患者行同期或分期逆行软性输尿管镜碎石术以清除残余结石。

结论

改良仰卧位下超声引导 PCNL 治疗复杂性肾结石是一种安全的治疗方法。然而,单次结石清除率不理想。根据我们的初步研究结果,仰卧位下无侧卧位可能不适合超声引导下 PCNL 治疗复杂性肾结石。

相似文献

1
Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?仰卧位是否适合超声引导经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石?
Urol Int. 2023;107(6):550-556. doi: 10.1159/000528677. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs flexible ureteroscopy for 1-2 cm lower pole renal stones: a randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜治疗1-2厘米下极肾结石的随机对照试验
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):437-445. doi: 10.1111/bju.16567. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
4
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
5
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
6
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of supine versus prone position for pediatric PCNL.一项关于小儿经皮肾镜取石术仰卧位与俯卧位疗效的最新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04428-y.
7
Standard v mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine modified lithotomy position: a randomized pilot study on 10-25 mm stones.仰卧位改良截石位下标准与迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗10 - 25毫米结石的随机初步研究
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jan-Feb;95(1-2):124-127. doi: 10.1111/ans.19227. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
8
Comparison of safety and efficacy of one shot dilation vs. gradual dilation technique in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中单次扩张与逐渐扩张技术的安全性和疗效比较。
World J Urol. 2023 Jun;41(6):1659-1666. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04393-0. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Mar;43(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9801-0. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.