• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3827 个简体中文字符的情感标注。

Sentiment annotations for 3827 simplified Chinese characters.

机构信息

Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):651-666. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02068-7. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02068-7
PMID:36754941
Abstract

Sentiment analysis in Chinese natural language processing has been largely based on words annotated with sentiment categories or scores. Characters, however, are the basic orthographic, phonological, and in most cases, semantic units in the Chinese language. This study collected sentiment annotations for 3827 characters. The ratings demonstrated high levels of reliability, and were validated through a comparison with the ratings of some characters' word equivalents reported in a previous norming study. Relations with other lexico-semantic variables and character processing efficiency were investigated. Furthermore, analyses of the association between constituent character valence and word valence revealed semantic compositionality and sentiment fusion characteristic of larger Chinese linguistic units. These ratings for characters, expanding current Chinese sentiment lexicons, can be utilized for the purposes of more precise stimuli assessment in research on Chinese character processing and more efficient sentiment analysis equipped with annotations of single-character words.

摘要

中文自然语言处理中的情感分析主要基于带有情感类别或分数的词汇。然而,汉字是中文的基本正字法、语音和语义单位。本研究收集了 3827 个汉字的情感标注。这些评分表现出了较高的可靠性,并通过与之前规范研究中报告的一些字符等价词的评分进行比较得到了验证。研究还探讨了与其他词汇语义变量和字符处理效率的关系。此外,对组成字符的情感与词的情感之间关系的分析揭示了较大的中文语言单位的语义组合性和情感融合特征。这些汉字的评分,扩展了现有的中文情感词汇,可用于汉字处理研究中更精确的刺激评估,以及配备单个字符词注释的更有效的情感分析。

相似文献

1
Sentiment annotations for 3827 simplified Chinese characters.3827 个简体中文字符的情感标注。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):651-666. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02068-7. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Neural dynamics of sentiment processing during naturalistic sentence reading.自然阅读句子时情绪处理的神经动力学。
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116934. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116934. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Compositionality of the Constituent Characters in Chinese Two-Character-Word Recognition by Adult Readers of High and Low Chinese Proficiency.高、低中文水平成年读者识别中文两字词的组成成分特征的可组合性。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Feb;51(1):195-216. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09833-9. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.香港汉字心理语言学规范:4376 个单汉字在语义透明度、习得年龄、熟悉度、形象度和具体度上的评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2989-3008. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01928-y. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.汉字和假字加工的脑机制比较:一项事件相关电位研究。
Int J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;45(2):102-10. doi: 10.1080/00207590903156439.
6
Development and validation of a Chinese pseudo-character/non-character producing system.中文伪字符/非字符生成系统的开发与验证
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):632-648. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01611-8. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
Effects of Phonological Consistency and Semantic Radical Combinability on N170 and P200 in the Reading of Chinese Phonograms.语音一致性和语义部首组合性对汉语形声字阅读中N170和P200的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 9;12:603878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603878. eCollection 2021.
8
Beyond quantity of experience: Exploring the role of semantic consistency in Chinese character knowledge.超越经验数量:探索语义一致性在汉字知识中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 May;50(5):819-832. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001294. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
9
Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong.香港粤语使用者对292个双字中文名词的效价、唤醒度、熟悉度、具体性和可想象性评级。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 27;12(3):e0174569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174569. eCollection 2017.
10
A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing.一项关于汉字正字法、语音和语义加工的 fMRI 研究的荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):381-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.047. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the intensity-ambiguity relationships among affective and lexico-semantic variables in Chinese characters and the character-word relationships in Chinese two-character words.揭示汉字中情感与词汇语义变量之间的强度-模糊关系以及汉语双字词中的字-词关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 15;57(8):224. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02753-9.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of valence in word processing: Evidence from lexical decision and emotional Stroop tasks.词汇加工中的词类作用:来自词汇判断和情绪斯特鲁普任务的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jul;218:103359. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103359. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters.3300+简体汉字的习得年龄。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):311-323. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01626-1. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words.11310 个简体中文字的效价和唤醒度评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):26-41. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01607-4. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
4
Aging and Pattern Complexity Effects on the Visual Span: Evidence from Chinese Character Recognition.衰老与模式复杂性对视幅的影响:来自汉字识别的证据。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Mar 22;3(1):11. doi: 10.3390/vision3010011.
5
Semantic ambiguity effects on traditional Chinese character naming: A corpus-based approach.基于语料库的方法探究语义歧义对繁体字命名的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2292-2304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0993-4.
6
MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese.MELD-SCH:简体中文词汇判断的一项巨量研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1763-1777. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0944-0.
7
Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study.具体性和其他语义变量的统计和方法学问题:一个列表记忆实验案例研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1198-1216. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0938-y.
8
Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong.香港粤语使用者对292个双字中文名词的效价、唤醒度、熟悉度、具体性和可想象性评级。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 27;12(3):e0174569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174569. eCollection 2017.
9
Affective norms for 720 French words rated by children and adolescents (FANchild).儿童和青少年评定的 720 个法文字词的情感规范(FANchild)。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1882-1893. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0831-0.
10
Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words.1100个中文词汇的效价、唤醒度、具体性、熟悉度、可想象性和语境可用性规范
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1374-1385. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2.