文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

使用真实世界的合成对照臂直接比较来苏卡妥基因马罗利塞尔与传统疗法治疗复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。

Use of a real-world synthetic control arm for direct comparison of lisocabtagene maraleucel and conventional therapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

作者信息

Van Le Hoa, Van Naarden Braun Kim, Nowakowski Grzegorz S, Sermer David, Radford John, Townsend William, Ghesquieres Herve, Menne Tobias, Porpaczy Edit, Fox Christopher P, Schusterbauer Claudia, Liu Fei Fei, Yue Lihua, De Benedetti Marc, Hasskarl Jens

机构信息

Biometrics and Data Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Translational Epidemiology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Leuk Lymphoma. 2023 Mar;64(3):573-585. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2160200. Epub 2023 Feb 8.


DOI:10.1080/10428194.2022.2160200
PMID:36755418
Abstract

This study used a real-world population as a synthetic comparator for the single-arm TRANSCEND NHL 001 study (TRANSCEND; NCT02631044) to evaluate the efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) compared with conventional (noncellular) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the real-world study closely matched the enrollment criteria in TRANSCEND. The analytic comparator cohort was created by matching and balancing observed baseline characteristics of real-world patients with those in TRANSCEND using propensity score methodology. Efficacy outcomes comparing liso-cel- ( = 257) and conventional therapy-treated ( = 257) patients, respectively, significantly favored liso-cel: overall response rate (74% vs 39%;  < 0.0001), complete response rate (50% vs 24%;  < 0.0001), median overall survival (23.5 vs 6.8 months;  < 0.0001), and median progression-free survival (3.5 vs 2.2 months;  < 0.0001). These results demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit of liso-cel in patients with third- or later-line R/R LBCL relative to conventional therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02631044.

摘要

本研究使用真实世界人群作为单臂TRANSCEND NHL 001研究(TRANSCEND;NCT02631044)的综合对照,以评估在复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者中,与传统(非细胞)疗法相比,利妥昔单抗(liso-cel)的疗效。真实世界研究的纳入和排除标准与TRANSCEND的入组标准紧密匹配。通过倾向评分方法,将真实世界患者的观察基线特征与TRANSCEND中的患者进行匹配和平衡,从而创建了分析对照队列。分别比较接受liso-cel治疗(n = 257)和传统疗法治疗(n = 257)的患者的疗效结果,显著有利于liso-cel:总缓解率(74%对39%;P < 0.0001)、完全缓解率(50%对24%;P < 0.0001)、中位总生存期(23.5对6.8个月;P < 0.0001)和中位无进展生存期(3.5对2.2个月;P < 0.0001)。这些结果表明,相对于传统疗法,liso-cel在三线或更晚期R/R LBCL患者中具有统计学显著且临床有意义的益处。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02631044。

相似文献

[1]
Use of a real-world synthetic control arm for direct comparison of lisocabtagene maraleucel and conventional therapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Leuk Lymphoma. 2023-3

[2]
Indirect Treatment Comparison of Liso-Cel vs. Salvage Chemotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: TRANSCEND vs. SCHOLAR-1.

Adv Ther. 2021-6

[3]
Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study.

Lancet. 2020-9-1

[4]
Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of liso-cel versus axi-cel in relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma.

J Hematol Oncol. 2021-9-8

[5]
Lisocabtagene maraleucel in the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Future Oncol. 2023-1

[6]
In Vivo Cellular Expansion of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel and Association With Efficacy and Safety in Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022-7

[7]
Phase 2 results of lisocabtagene maraleucel in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Cancer Med. 2022-12

[8]
Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Lancet. 2022-6-18

[9]
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus lisocabtagene maraleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the US.

J Med Econ. 2022

[10]
Comparative efficacy of tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel among adults with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas: an indirect treatment comparison.

Leuk Lymphoma. 2022-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Externally Controlled Trials.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-9-2

[2]
Prognostic factors and effect modifiers in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who failed at least two lines of therapy: a systematic literature and expert clinical review.

Ann Hematol. 2025-9-2

[3]
CAR T-cell therapy in hematologic and solid malignancies: mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.

Med Oncol. 2025-7-25

[4]
Selinexor Reduces the Immunosuppression of Macrophages and Synergizes With CD19 CAR-T Cells Against B-Cell Lymphoma.

Cancer Sci. 2025-9

[5]
Prognostic Factors and Effect Modifiers in Patients With Relapse or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Two Lines of Therapy: A Systematic Literature and Expert Clinical Review.

Eur J Haematol. 2025-8

[6]
Synthetic Data in Healthcare and Drug Development: Definitions, Regulatory Frameworks, Issues.

CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025-5

[7]
Comparative efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel in the PILOT study second-line chemotherapy regimens in the real world.

Haematologica. 2025-3-1

[8]
Challenges and Lessons Learned in Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Development from a Statistical Perspective.

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索