Blankenship Derek M, Usvyat Len, Kraus Michael A, Chatoth Dinesh K, Lasky Rachel, Turk Joseph E, Maddux Franklin W
Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, Global Medical Office, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Hemodial Int. 2023 Apr;27(2):165-173. doi: 10.1111/hdi.13068. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Inadequate predialysis care and education impacts the selection of a dialysis modality and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Transitional care units (TCUs) aim to meet the unmet educational needs of incident dialysis patients, but their impact beyond increasing home dialysis utilization has been incompletely characterized.
This retrospective study included adults initiating in-center hemodialysis at a TCU, matched to controls (1:4) with no TCU history initiating in-center hemodialysis. Patients were followed for up to 14 months. TCUs are dedicated spaces where staff provide personalized education and as-needed adjustments to dialysis prescriptions. For many patients, therapy was initiated with four to five weekly dialysis sessions, with at least some sessions delivered by home dialysis machines. Outcomes included survival, first hospitalization, transplant waiting-list status, post-TCU dialysis modality, and vascular access type.
The study included 724 patients initiating dialysis across 48 TCUs, with 2892 well-matched controls. At the end of 14 months, patients initiating dialysis in a TCU were significantly more likely to be referred and/or wait-listed for a kidney transplant than controls (57% vs. 42%; p < 0.0001). Initiation of dialysis at a TCU was also associated with significantly lower rates of receiving in-center hemodialysis at 14 months (74% vs. 90%; p < 0.0001) and higher rates of arteriovenous access (70% vs. 63%; p = 0.003). Although not statistically significant, TCU patients were more likely to survive and less likely to be hospitalized during follow-up than controls.
Although TCUs are sometimes viewed as only a means for enhancing utilization of home dialysis, patients attending TCUs exhibited more favorable outcomes across all endpoints. In addition to being 2.5-fold more likely to receive home dialysis, TCU patients were 42% more likely to be referred for transplantation. Our results support expanding utilization of TCUs for patients with inadequate predialysis support.
透析前护理和教育不足会影响透析方式的选择,并与不良临床结局相关。过渡护理单元(TCU)旨在满足初治透析患者未得到满足的教育需求,但其除了提高家庭透析利用率之外的影响尚未得到充分描述。
这项回顾性研究纳入了在TCU开始进行中心血液透析的成年人,并与无TCU病史且开始进行中心血液透析的对照组(1:4)进行匹配。对患者进行长达14个月的随访。TCU是专门的区域,工作人员在其中提供个性化教育,并根据需要调整透析处方。对于许多患者,治疗开始时每周进行四至五次透析,至少有一些透析由家庭透析机完成。结局指标包括生存率、首次住院情况、移植等待名单状态、TCU后的透析方式以及血管通路类型。
该研究纳入了48个TCU中开始透析的724例患者,以及2892例匹配良好的对照组。在14个月结束时,在TCU开始透析的患者比对照组更有可能被转诊和/或列入肾脏移植等待名单(57%对42%;p<0.0001)。在TCU开始透析还与14个月时接受中心血液透析的比例显著降低(74%对90%;p<0.0001)以及动静脉通路比例较高(70%对63%;p = 0.003)相关。虽然无统计学意义,但在随访期间,TCU患者比对照组更有可能存活且住院可能性更小。
尽管TCU有时仅被视为提高家庭透析利用率的一种手段,但在所有终点方面,入住TCU的患者均表现出更有利的结局。除了接受家庭透析的可能性高出2.5倍之外,TCU患者被转诊进行移植的可能性还要高出42%。我们的结果支持扩大TCU对透析前支持不足患者的应用。