Rousseau Adrien, Tagliamento Marco, Auclin Edouard, Aldea Mihaela, Frelaut Maxime, Levy Antonin, Benitez Jose C, Naltet Charles, Lavaud Pernelle, Botticella Angela, Grecea Miruna, Chaput Nathalie, Barlesi Fabrice, Planchard David, Besse Benjamin
Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;182:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
We aimed to determine whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) time-of-day infusion might influence the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
We retrospectively analysed patients who received single-agent anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in any line between 2016 and 2021. We calculated by Cox regression models the association between the proportion of ICI infusions received after 16:30h and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
180 patients were included, 77% received ICI as second- or further-line (median of 12 infusions/patient). The median age was 65 years (IQR 57-70), 112 patients (62%) were male, 165 (92%) were current or former tobacco smokers, 140 (78%) had performance status (PS) 0 or 1, 26 (14%) were on steroid therapy at ICI initiation. Histology was non-squamous for 139 (77%), the median number of metastatic sites was 3, and 33% had brain metastases. Patients who received at least 20% of ICI infusions after 16:30h (65 out of 180, 36%) had a statistically significant shorter median PFS as compared with patients receiving less than 20% of infusions in the evening (4.9 vs 9.4 months, log-rank p = 0.020), while numerical but not statistical shorter OS was observed (14.0 vs 26.2 months, log-rank p = 0.090). In the multivariate analysis, receiving at least 20% of evening infusions did not significantly increase the risk of death, while PS and line of treatment were significantly correlated with the OS. On the contrary, a proportion of ICI administration after 16:30h ≥20% conferred an HR for the PFS of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.01-2.05, p = 0.043), but this prognostic effect was not found when including in the model the total number of ICI infusions received (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.83-1.75, p = 0.329).
Time-of-day infusion of ICI may impact the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. Underlying prognostic characteristics and the number of infusions received could represent conceivable confounding factors, linked to increased variance related to ICI infusion timing. Nonetheless, further studies may unravel chronobiological mechanisms modulating ICI efficacy.
我们旨在确定免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)一天中的输注时间是否会影响晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存。
我们回顾性分析了2016年至2021年间接受任何一线单药抗PD-(L)1治疗的患者。我们通过Cox回归模型计算16:30之后接受的ICI输注比例与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)之间的关联。
纳入180例患者,77%接受ICI作为二线或更后线治疗(每位患者中位数为12次输注)。中位年龄为65岁(四分位间距57 - 70岁),112例患者(62%)为男性,165例(92%)为当前或既往吸烟者,140例(78%)体能状态(PS)为0或1,26例(14%)在开始ICI治疗时接受类固醇治疗。组织学类型为非鳞状的有139例(77%),转移部位中位数为3个,33%有脑转移。16:30之后接受至少20%的ICI输注的患者(180例中的65例,36%)与晚上接受少于20%输注的患者相比,中位PFS在统计学上显著更短(4.9个月对9.4个月,对数秩检验p = 0.020),而观察到OS数值上更短但无统计学差异(14.0个月对26.2个月,对数秩检验p = 0.090)。在多变量分析中,晚上接受至少20%的输注并未显著增加死亡风险,而PS和治疗线与OS显著相关。相反,16:30之后ICI给药比例≥20%使PFS的风险比为1.44(95%置信区间:1.01 - 2.05,p = 0.043),但在模型中纳入接受的ICI输注总数时未发现这种预后效应(风险比1.20,95%置信区间:0.83 - 1.75,p = 0.329)。
ICI一天中的输注时间可能影响晚期NSCLC患者的生存。潜在的预后特征和接受的输注次数可能是可想象的混杂因素,与ICI输注时间相关的方差增加有关。尽管如此,进一步的研究可能会揭示调节ICI疗效的生物钟机制。