Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):746-757. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1541. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
We aimed to assess the humoral response to and reactogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination according to the vaccine type and to analyze factors associated with immunogenicity in actively treated solid cancer patients (CPs).
Prospective cohorts of CPs, undergoing anticancer treatment, and healthcare workers (HCWs) were established. The participants had no history of previous COVID-19 and received either mRNA-based or adenovirus vector-based (AdV) vaccines as the primary series. Blood samples were collected before the first vaccination and after 2 weeks for each dose vaccination. Spike-specific binding antibodies (bAbs) in all participants and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) wild-type, Delta, and Omicron variants in CPs were analyzed and presented as the geometric mean titer.
Age-matched 20 HCWs and 118 CPs were included in the analysis. The bAb seroconversion rate and antibody concentrations after the first vaccination were significantly lower in CPs than in HCWs. After the third vaccination, antibody levels in CPs with a primary series of AdV were comparable to those in HCWs, but nAb titers against the Omicron variant did not quantitatively increase in CPs with AdV vaccine as the primary series. The incidence and severity of adverse reactions post-vaccination were similar between CPs and HCWs.
CPs displayed delayed humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The booster dose elicited comparable bAb concentrations between CPs and HCWs, regardless of the primary vaccine type. Neutralization against the Omicron variant was not robustly elicited following the booster dose in some CPs, implying the need for additional interventions to protect them from COVID-19.
我们旨在根据疫苗类型评估 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种的体液反应和不良反应,并分析与正在接受积极治疗的实体癌患者(CPs)免疫原性相关的因素。
建立了正在接受癌症治疗的 CPs 和医护人员(HCWs)的前瞻性队列。这些参与者没有 COVID-19 的既往病史,并且接受了基于 mRNA 或腺病毒载体(AdV)的疫苗作为基础系列。在每次剂量接种前和接种后 2 周采集血液样本。在所有参与者中分析了 Spike 特异性结合抗体(bAbs),并在 CPs 中分析了针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)野生型、Delta 和 Omicron 变体的中和抗体(nAbs),并以几何平均滴度表示。
年龄匹配的 20 名 HCWs 和 118 名 CPs 纳入分析。CPs 的 bAb 血清转化率和首次接种后的抗体浓度明显低于 HCWs。在第三次接种后,接受 AdV 作为基础系列的 CPs 的抗体水平与 HCWs 相当,但作为基础系列接受 AdV 疫苗的 CPs 的针对 Omicron 变体的 nAb 滴度没有定量增加。接种后不良反应的发生率和严重程度在 CPs 和 HCWs 之间相似。
CPs 在接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后表现出延迟的体液免疫反应。无论基础疫苗类型如何,加强剂量均可在 CPs 和 HCWs 之间产生相当的 bAb 浓度。在一些 CPs 中,加强剂量后针对 Omicron 变体的中和作用没有得到很好的激发,这意味着需要采取额外的干预措施来保护他们免受 COVID-19 的侵害。