Correia Jorge César, Waqas Ahmed, Assal Jean-Philippe, Davies Melanie J, Somers Florence, Golay Alain, Pataky Zoltan
Unit of Therapeutic Patient Education, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 25;9:996528. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.996528. eCollection 2022.
Chronic disorders are highly prevalent and are a major contributor to death and disability worldwide. Evidence has shown that therapeutic patient education (TPE) interventions are effective in improving a range of biomedical and psychological outcomes for a variety of chronic disorders. This has been demonstrated in scores of randomized controlled and evidence-synthesis studies. However, no quantitative evidence has been published so far on the content and effective teaching strategies in TPE programs. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to bridge this gap by answering the of TPE programs.
Using a pretested search strategy, we searched the Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the COCHRANE databases, from inception to August 2019. The search strategy was based on four comprehensive search concepts (patient education, chronic diseases, study design, and outcomes). After a careful screening for eligible studies, two reviewers extracted qualitative and quantitative data from the randomized controlled trials on the TPE interventions. We also developed a taxonomy of curriculum skills and intervention delivery techniques to aid the extraction of data in these domains.
We found that these interventions were effective in improving biological outcomes (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38-0.57), adherence to the treatment regimen (SMD = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.46-1.002), knowledge (SMD = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.79-1.65), self-efficacy (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.30-0.56), and psychological health (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.29). This effectiveness was consistent across different delivery formats (individual, group, and electronic) and delivery agents (non-specialists vs. specialists).
The flexibility in the choice of mode of delivery and curriculum development gives stakeholders an opportunity to scale up TPE interventions in healthcare settings.
Identifier: CRD42019141294.
慢性疾病非常普遍,是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因。有证据表明,治疗性患者教育(TPE)干预措施对于改善各种慢性疾病的一系列生物医学和心理结果是有效的。这已在大量随机对照研究和证据综合研究中得到证实。然而,迄今为止,尚未发表关于TPE项目内容和有效教学策略的定量证据。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在通过回答TPE项目的相关问题来弥补这一差距。
我们采用预先测试的检索策略,检索了从创刊到2019年8月的Web of Science、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Cochrane数据库。检索策略基于四个综合检索概念(患者教育、慢性疾病、研究设计和结果)。在仔细筛选符合条件的研究后,两名评价者从关于TPE干预措施的随机对照试验中提取定性和定量数据。我们还制定了课程技能和干预实施技术的分类法,以帮助在这些领域提取数据。
我们发现这些干预措施在改善生物学结果(标准化均数差[SMD]=0.48;95%可信区间[CI]:0.38 - 0.57)、治疗方案依从性(SMD = 0.73;95%CI:0.46 - 1.002)、知识(SMD = 1.22;95%CI:0.79 - 1.65)、自我效能感(SMD = 0.43;95%CI:0.30 - 0.56)和心理健康(SMD = -0.41;95%CI:-0.53至-0.29)方面是有效的。这种有效性在不同的实施形式(个体、小组和电子形式)和实施者(非专科医生与专科医生)中是一致的。
实施方式和课程开发选择的灵活性为利益相关者提供了在医疗环境中扩大TPE干预措施规模的机会。
标识符:CRD42019141294。