Rimac Anja, Šegota Vedran, Alegro Antun, Vuković Nina, Koletić Nikola
Department of Botany, Division of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia Department of Botany, Division of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia.
Biodivers Data J. 2022 May 25;10:e83902. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.10.e83902. eCollection 2022.
An extensive macrophyte field survey of running and standing waters was conducted from 2016 to 2021 at 786 sampling sites across Croatia as a part of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. This survey is the first to present a comprehensive floristic catalogue of the freshwater bryoflora, along with an analysis of the distribution and diversity patterns on a national level. In all, 83 bryophyte species (68 mosses and 15 liverworts) were recorded in the 228 sites, with average species richness of 4.17 species per site. The most frequent species were , , and . The majority of the species encountered were rarely found, with over 70% of species recorded on less than 10 sampling sites and the majority of the species not being truly aquatic, rather being classified as facultative aquatics. The Dinaric Ecoregion, characterised by clean, cold, fast-flowing karstic rivers, especially in the Continental Subecoregion, supported higher freshwater bryophyte diversity than the lowland Pannonian Ecoregion, with mostly slow, eutrophic lowland watercourses with unstable sandy and gravelly alluvial sediments. Chorological comparison of Croatian eco- and subecoregions revealed the expected dominance of circumpolar and European elements, i.e. temperate chorotypes, as well as some biogeographical differences. The most frequent life forms were aquatic trailings and turfs. Amongst the recorded species, perennials and colonists were the most represented life strategies. The analysis of both the life-form and life-strategy spectra showed some differences amongst the Croatian regions, supporting the fact that the Dinaric Ecoregion provides more truly aquatic habitats and microhabitats suitable for the freshwater bryophytes, while in the Pannonian Ecoregion freshwater bryophytes dominantly inhabit the periodically submerged riparian zones, for example shaded lowland forest streams and rivulets or gently sloping margins of rivers and lakes.
作为《水框架指令》实施工作的一部分,2016年至2021年期间,在克罗地亚各地的786个采样点对流动水体和静水水体中的大型植物进行了广泛的实地调查。本次调查首次呈现了淡水苔藓植物的全面植物区系目录,并对国家层面的分布和多样性模式进行了分析。在228个采样点共记录了83种苔藓植物(68种藓类和15种苔类),每个采样点的平均物种丰富度为4.17种。最常见的物种是 、 、 和 。所遇到的大多数物种很少被发现,超过70%的物种记录在不到10个采样点,且大多数物种并非真正的水生植物,而是被归类为兼性水生植物。迪纳拉生态区以清洁、寒冷、水流湍急的岩溶河流为特征,特别是在大陆次生态区,其淡水苔藓植物多样性高于低地潘诺尼亚生态区,后者主要是缓慢流动、富营养化的低地水道,有不稳定的沙质和砾质冲积沉积物。对克罗地亚生态区和次生态区的分布区学比较揭示了环极地和欧洲元素即温带分布型的预期主导地位,以及一些生物地理差异。最常见的生活型是水生拖曳植物和草皮。在记录的物种中,多年生植物和拓殖者是最具代表性的生活策略。对生活型和生活策略谱的分析显示克罗地亚各地区之间存在一些差异,这支持了以下事实:迪纳拉生态区提供了更多适合淡水苔藓植物的真正水生栖息地和微生境,而在潘诺尼亚生态区,淡水苔藓植物主要栖息在周期性被淹没的河岸带,例如阴凉的低地森林溪流和小河,或河流和湖泊的缓坡边缘。