Xu Jiachen, Yin Yu, Yang Jun, Chen Li, Li Zhi, Shen Jian, Wang Wansheng, Ni Caifang
Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 25;13:957722. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.957722. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to investigate the cutoff value of quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and compare the performance of the modified criteria to one-dimensional criteria in survival prediction.
A retrospective single-center study was performed for treatment-naive patients with HCC who underwent initial TACE between June 2015 and June 2019. Treatment response assessment was performed after the first observation by contrast CT or MRI, with the measurement of diameters by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and volumes by quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint of this study. The new cutoff value for volumetric response evaluation criteria was created using restricted cubic splines. The performance of modified qEASL (mqEASL, with the new cutoff value) and mRECIST on survival prediction was compared by Cox regression models in internal and external validation.
A total of 129 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 111 men) were included and divided into training (n=90) and validation (n=39) cohorts. The cutoff value for the viable volume reduction was set at 57.0%. The mqEASL enabled separation of non-responders and responders in terms of median OS (p<0.001), 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.5-17.2 months) vs. 31.5 months (95% CI, 25.5-44.0 months). Two multivariate models were developed with independent prognostic factors (tumor response, metastasis, portal vein tumor thrombus, and subsequent treatment) to predict OS. Model 2 (for mqEASL) had a greater Harrel's C index, higher time-dependent area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUROC), and more precise calibration on 6-month survival rates than Model 1 (for mRECIST).
With the modified cutoff value, the quantitative and volumetric response of HCC patients to TACE becomes a precise predictor of overall survival. Further studies are needed to verify this modification before application in clinical practice.
本研究旨在探讨经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)后肝细胞癌(HCC)患者定量和体积反应评估标准的临界值,并比较改良标准与一维标准在生存预测中的性能。
对2015年6月至2019年6月期间首次接受TACE治疗的初治HCC患者进行回顾性单中心研究。首次通过对比增强CT或MRI观察后进行治疗反应评估,采用改良实体瘤疗效评价标准(mRECIST)测量直径,采用定量欧洲肝脏研究协会(qEASL)标准测量体积。总生存期(OS)是本研究的主要终点。使用受限立方样条创建体积反应评估标准的新临界值。通过Cox回归模型在内部和外部验证中比较改良qEASL(mqEASL,采用新临界值)和mRECIST在生存预测中的性能。
共纳入129例患者(平均年龄60岁±11[标准差];111例男性),分为训练组(n = 90)和验证组(n = 39)。存活体积缩小的临界值设定为57.0%。mqEASL能够根据中位OS(p < 0.001)区分无反应者和反应者,分别为11.2个月(95%CI,8.5 - 17.2个月)和31.5个月(95%CI,25.5 - 44.0个月)。建立了两个包含独立预后因素(肿瘤反应、转移、门静脉癌栓和后续治疗)的多变量模型来预测OS。模型2(用于mqEASL)的Harrel's C指数更高,接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)的时间依赖性面积更大,在6个月生存率方面的校准比模型1(用于mRECIST)更精确。
采用改良临界值后,HCC患者对TACE的定量和体积反应成为总生存期的精确预测指标。在临床实践中应用之前,需要进一步研究验证这种改良。