University of Chester, UK.
University of Sheffield, UK.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8065-8087. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153877. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) commonly co-occur, and researchers often estimate their impact using a cumulative risk approach. The person-centered approach offers another approach to operationalize the co-occurrence of ACEs. This study aims to estimate latent classes of ACEs in a sample of U.K. children, examine their relationship with emotional and behavioral problems, and compare the explanatory value of the latent classes to cumulative risk scores. Data were collected among a general population sample of British 10-year-old children extracted from the U.K. Household Longitudinal Study ( = 601). Seven items characterized ACEs, comprising parent-report physical discipline, emotional abuse, supervisory neglect, maternal psychological distress, child-report parental educational disinterest, bullying victimization, and adverse neighborhood. Outcome measures were derived from the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire including total difficulties, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and prosocial behavior. Latent class analysis resulted in a three-class solution: low ACEs, household challenges, and community challenges. Compared to the other classes, the community challenges class scored substantially worse on total difficulties, emotional symptoms, and peer subscales. The cumulative risk score was associated with all outcomes except prosocial behavior. Cumulative risk models accounted for a larger proportion of variance compared with the latent class models, except for peer problems which the person-centered model explained better. This study confirms that ACEs are associated with impairment in child functioning, and that both person-centered and cumulative risk approaches can capture this relationship well. Specifically, the person-centered approach demonstrated how co-occurring risk factors in the community challenges class produced particularly poor internalizing outcomes.
不良的童年经历(ACEs)通常同时发生,研究人员通常使用累积风险方法来估计其影响。以个体为中心的方法提供了另一种操作 ACEs 同时发生的方法。本研究旨在估计英国儿童样本中 ACEs 的潜在类别,检查它们与情绪和行为问题的关系,并比较潜在类别与累积风险评分的解释价值。数据是从英国家庭纵向研究(n=601)中提取的英国 10 岁儿童的一般人群样本中收集的。有七个项目描述了 ACEs,包括父母报告的身体纪律、情感虐待、监督疏忽、母亲心理困扰、儿童报告的父母教育不感兴趣、被欺凌和不良邻里关系。结果测量是从自我报告的《长处和困难问卷》中得出的,包括总困难、情绪症状、行为问题、多动、同伴问题和亲社会行为。潜在类别分析产生了一个三类别解决方案:低 ACEs、家庭挑战和社区挑战。与其他类别相比,社区挑战类在总困难、情绪症状和同伴分量表上的得分明显较差。累积风险评分与除亲社会行为外的所有结果都有关。与潜在类别模型相比,累积风险模型解释了更大比例的方差,除了同伴问题,以个体为中心的模型解释得更好。本研究证实,ACEs 与儿童功能障碍有关,以个体为中心和累积风险的方法都可以很好地捕捉到这种关系。具体来说,以个体为中心的方法表明,社区挑战类中共同存在的风险因素如何产生特别差的内化结果。