• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺开放、机器人和胸腔镜肺叶切除术(PORTaL)研究:6646 例病例的生存分析。

Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: Survival Analysis of 6646 Cases.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):1002-1009. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005820. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005820
PMID:36762564
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze overall survival (OS) of robotic-assisted lobectomy (RL), video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS), and open lobectomy (OL) performed by experienced thoracic surgeons across multiple institutions.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Surgeons have increasingly adopted RL for resection of early-stage lung cancer. Comparative survival data following these approaches is largely from single-institution case series or administrative data sets.

METHODS

Retrospective data was collected from 21 institutions from 2013 to 2019. Consecutive cases performed for clinical stage IA-IIIA lung cancer were included. Induction therapy patients were excluded. The propensity-score method of inverse-probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate association among OS and relevant risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2789 RL, 2661 VATS, and 1196 OL cases were included. The unadjusted 5-year OS rate was highest for OL (84%) followed by RL (81%) and VATS (74%); P =0.008. Similar trends were also observed after inverse-probability of treatment weighting adjustment (RL 81%; VATS 73%, OL 85%, P =0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that OL and RL were associated with significantly higher OS compared with VATS (OL vs. VATS: hazard ratio=0.64, P <0.001 and RL vs. VATS: hazard ratio=0.79; P =0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding from this large multicenter study suggests that patients undergoing RL and OL have statistically similar OS, while the VATS group was associated with shorter OS. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to help evaluate these observations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析经验丰富的胸外科医生在多个机构中进行的机器人辅助肺叶切除术(RL)、电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术(VATS)和开胸肺叶切除术(OL)的总生存率(OS)。

背景资料概要

外科医生越来越多地采用 RL 进行早期肺癌切除术。这些方法的比较生存数据主要来自单机构病例系列或行政数据集。

方法

从 2013 年至 2019 年,从 21 个机构收集了回顾性数据。纳入了临床分期 I 期至 IIIA 期肺癌的连续病例。排除了诱导治疗患者。采用逆概率治疗加权的倾向评分法来平衡基线特征。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计 OS。多变量 Cox 比例风险模型用于评估 OS 与相关危险因素之间的关联。

结果

共纳入 2789 例 RL、2661 例 VATS 和 1196 例 OL 病例。未调整的 5 年 OS 率 OL 最高(84%),其次是 RL(81%)和 VATS(74%);P=0.008。在进行治疗可能性反概率加权调整后,也观察到了类似的趋势(RL 81%;VATS 73%,OL 85%,P=0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,OL 和 RL 与 VATS 相比,OS 显著更高(OL 与 VATS:风险比=0.64,P<0.001,RL 与 VATS:风险比=0.79;P=0.007)。

结论

我们从这项大型多中心研究中得出的发现表明,接受 RL 和 OL 的患者的 OS 统计上相似,而 VATS 组的 OS 较短。需要进一步进行更长随访的研究来帮助评估这些观察结果。

相似文献

1
Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: Survival Analysis of 6646 Cases.肺开放、机器人和胸腔镜肺叶切除术(PORTaL)研究:6646 例病例的生存分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):1002-1009. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005820. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: An Analysis of 5721 Cases.肺开放、机器人和胸腔镜肺叶切除术(PORTaL)研究:5721 例分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):528-533. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005115. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study: Outcomes and risk factors of conversion during minimally invasive lobectomy.肺开放、机器人和胸腔镜肺叶切除术研究:微创肺叶切除术中转换的结果和风险因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;166(1):251-262.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.050. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Versus Video-assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Thoracotomy Approach.机器人肺叶切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术和开胸手术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的长期肿瘤学结果比较。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 May;21(3):214-224.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
5
Propensity-score adjusted comparison of pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.机器人辅助、电视辅助胸腔镜和开放性肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌病理性淋巴结分期上调的倾向评分调整比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Nov;158(5):1457-1466.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.113. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy For Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, and Thoracotomy Lobectomy.基于临床I期非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术手术方式的长期生存情况:机器人手术、电视辅助胸腔镜手术和开胸肺叶切除术的比较
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):431-437. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001708.
7
Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Lobectomy: Propensity-Matched Analysis of Recent Premier Data.机器人辅助、电视胸腔镜辅助和开放性肺叶切除术:基于近期Premier数据的倾向匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov;104(5):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.020.
8
Long-term survival following open versus thoracoscopic lobectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌术前化疗后开胸与胸腔镜肺叶切除术后的长期生存情况。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jun;49(6):1615-23. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv428. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
9
Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with improved short-term and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open lobectomy for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of 963 cases.对于临床I期非小细胞肺癌,与开胸肺叶切除术相比,胸腔镜肺叶切除术与改善短期疗效及相当的肿瘤学结局相关:一项对963例病例的倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):607-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu036. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage IA lung cancer: a multi-institutional study.多种电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗临床ⅠA期肺癌的长期疗效:一项多机构研究
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Sep;132(3):507-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.058.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of short-term outcomes between multi-arm uniportal and multiport robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery based on propensity score matching.基于倾向评分匹配的多臂单孔与多孔机器人辅助胸腔镜手术短期结局比较
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 9;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03881-4.
2
Next-Day Discharge Is Feasible in Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Anatomical Lung Resections Irrespective of Patient Characteristics.无论患者特征如何,机器人辅助胸外科解剖性肺切除术后次日出院是可行的。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 5;14(9):3198. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093198.
3
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery - A propensity score matching analysis.
杂交单孔机器人辅助手术与单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术围手术期结局的比较——倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Thorac Med. 2025 Apr-Jun;20(2):125-133. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_236_24. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Implementation of a robotic-assisted thoracic surgery program for anatomical lung resections, a single surgeon's experience.实施机器人辅助胸外科解剖性肺切除术计划:一位外科医生的经验
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):1335-1348. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1182. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Single-center retrospective study on the clinical application of multi-arm robotic-assisted uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.多臂机器人辅助单孔胸腔镜手术临床应用的单中心回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 16;19(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02256-x.
6
Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer: An analysis of initial outcomes based on the National Clinical Database.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗原发性肺癌的临床病理特征及围手术期结局:基于国家临床数据库的初步结局分析
Surg Today. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-02992-5.
7
Ten-year survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery open major lung resection for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a large cohort study in China.电视辅助胸腔镜手术对Ⅰ-Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌进行开放性肺大切除的十年生存结果:一项中国的大型队列研究
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):2162-2174. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-150. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
8
Initial experience with robotic technology for thoracic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system in Tibet, China.中国西藏地区使用达芬奇 Xi 系统进行胸外科手术的机器人技术初步经验。
Front Surg. 2024 May 30;11:1415704. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1415704. eCollection 2024.
9
The Uncomfortable Truth: Open Thoracotomy versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.令人不安的真相:肺癌开胸手术与微创手术的对比:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 5;15(9):2630. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092630.