Suppr超能文献

压电切开辅助下颌第二磨牙牵引对牙周组织、牙槽骨高度及下颌第二磨牙牙根吸收的影响

Effect of piezocision-assisted lower second molar protraction on periodontal tissues, alveolar bone height, and lower second molar root resorption.

作者信息

Alhaija Elham S Abu, Al-Areqi Marwan M, AlShami Raed, Al Maaitah Emad F, Wahadni Ahed Al

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2023 May 1;93(3):306-312. doi: 10.2319/090622-621.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of piezocision on periodontal tissues and alveolar bone height and to detect lower second molar root resorption in piezocision-assisted mandibular second molar protraction compared to no-piezocision molar protraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one subjects (four males, 17 females, aged 22.43 ± 2.83 years) who presented with bilateral extraction of lower first molars were included. The patients were divided into two groups; Group 1: Piezocision-assisted molar protraction (right or left side of subjects) in which piezocision was performed immediately before lower second molar protraction and, Group 2: No-piezocision molar protraction in which lower second molar protraction was not surgically assisted. Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), periodontal pocket depth (PPD), width of keratinized gingiva (WKG), gingival recession (GR), lower second molar mesial root resorption, alveolar bone height, and mandibular bone height were recorded at T1 (immediately before molar protraction) and at T2 (after second molar space closure).

RESULTS

In the piezocision-assisted molar protraction group, significant changes were detected in the WKG (P < .001), GR (P < .05), and the mandibular bone height (P < .001). Compared to the no-piezocision group, piezocision-assisted molar protraction resulted in an increased WKG (P < .001) and less second molar mesial root resorption (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Piezocision does not have any detrimental effect on the periodontium and produces less root resorption.

摘要

目的

评估压电切开术对牙周组织和牙槽骨高度的影响,并检测与非压电切开术辅助下颌第二磨牙前移相比,压电切开术辅助下颌第二磨牙前移时下颌第二磨牙牙根吸收情况。

材料与方法

纳入21例双侧拔除下颌第一磨牙的受试者(4例男性,17例女性,年龄22.43±2.83岁)。将患者分为两组;第1组:压电切开术辅助磨牙前移组(受试者的右侧或左侧),在进行下颌第二磨牙前移前立即进行压电切开术;第2组:非压电切开术磨牙前移组,下颌第二磨牙前移未采用手术辅助。在T1(磨牙前移前即刻)和T2(第二磨牙间隙关闭后)记录菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、牙周袋深度(PPD)、角化龈宽度(WKG)、牙龈退缩(GR)、下颌第二磨牙近中牙根吸收、牙槽骨高度和下颌骨高度。

结果

在压电切开术辅助磨牙前移组中,检测到WKG(P <.001)、GR(P <.05)和下颌骨高度(P <.001)有显著变化。与非压电切开术组相比,压电切开术辅助磨牙前移导致WKG增加(P <.001),第二磨牙近中牙根吸收减少(P <.01)。

结论

压电切开术对牙周组织没有任何有害影响,并且产生较少的牙根吸收。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Orthodontic treatment time: can it be shortened?正畸治疗时间:可以缩短吗?
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):90-105. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.090-105.sar.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验