Gutin Iliya, Copeland William, Godwin Jennifer, Mullan Harris Kathleen, Shanahan Lilly, Gaydosh Lauren
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
University of Vermont, Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;320:115764. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115764. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Despite considerable scientific interest in documenting growing despair among U.S. adults, far less attention has been paid to defining despair and identifying appropriate measures. Emerging perspectives from social science and psychiatry outline a comprehensive, multidimensional view of despair, inclusive of individuals' cognitive, emotional, biological and somatic, and behavioral circumstances. The current study assesses the structure and plausibility of this framework based on longitudinal data spanning early to middle adulthood. We identified 40 measures of different dimensions of despair in Wave IV (2008-2009) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adult to Adolescent Health (n = 9149). We used structural equation modeling to evaluate hypothesized relationships among observed and latent variables; we then regressed Wave V (2016-2018) suicidality, heavy drinking, marijuana use, prescription drug misuse, and illicit drug use on latent despair. Our analyses find that models for separate dimensions of despair and overall despair demonstrated excellent fit. Overall despair was a significant predictor of Wave V outcomes, especially suicidality, accounting for 20% of its variation, as compared to 1%-7% of the variation in substance use. Suicidality was consistently associated with all domains of despair; behavioral despair explained the most variation in substance use. Given these results we contend that, lacking direct measures, latent despair can be modeled using available survey items; however, some items are likely better indicators of latent dimensions of despair than others. Moreover, the association between despair and key health behaviors varies considerably, challenging its status as a mechanism simultaneously underlying increased substance use and suicide mortality in the United States. Critically, further validation of measures in other surveys can improve the operationalization of despair and its associated conceptual and theoretical frameworks, thus advancing our understanding of this concept.
尽管科学界对记录美国成年人日益增长的绝望情绪有着浓厚兴趣,但在定义绝望和确定合适的衡量标准方面所给予的关注却少得多。社会科学和精神病学的新观点勾勒出了一个关于绝望的全面、多维度视角,包括个体的认知、情感、生物和躯体以及行为状况。本研究基于从成年早期到中年期的纵向数据,评估了这一框架的结构和合理性。我们在《成人到青少年健康全国纵向研究》第四波(2008 - 2009年)中确定了40项衡量绝望不同维度的指标(n = 9149)。我们使用结构方程模型来评估观测变量和潜在变量之间的假设关系;然后我们将第五波(2016 - 2018年)的自杀倾向、酗酒、吸食大麻、滥用处方药和使用非法药物情况对潜在绝望进行回归分析。我们的分析发现,绝望各单独维度和总体绝望的模型拟合度都非常好。总体绝望是第五波各项结果的一个重要预测因素,尤其是自杀倾向,占其变异的20%,而在物质使用变异中占比为1% - 7%。自杀倾向始终与绝望的所有领域相关;行为绝望在物质使用变异中解释的比例最大。鉴于这些结果,我们认为,在缺乏直接测量方法的情况下,可以使用现有的调查项目对潜在绝望进行建模;然而,有些项目可能比其他项目更能作为潜在绝望维度的指标。此外,绝望与关键健康行为之间的关联差异很大,这对其作为美国物质使用增加和自杀死亡率上升的共同潜在机制的地位提出了挑战。至关重要的是,在其他调查中对测量方法进行进一步验证,可以改进绝望及其相关概念和理论框架的操作化,从而增进我们对这一概念的理解。