Center for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;357:117197. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117197. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
The label "deaths of despair" for rising US mortality related to drugs/alcohol/suicide seems to implicate emotional distress as the cause. However, a Durkheimian approach would argue that underlying structural factors shape individuals' behavior and emotions. Despite a growing literature on deaths of despair, no study has directly compared the effects of distress and structural factors on deaths of despair versus other causes of mortality. Using data from the Midlife in the United States study with approximately 26 years of mortality follow-up, we evaluated whether psychological or economic distress, employment status, and social integration were more strongly associated with drug/alcohol/suicide mortality than with other causes. Cox hazard models, adjusted for potential confounders, showed little evidence that psychological or economic distress were more strongly associated with mortality related to drugs/alcohol/suicide than mortality from other causes. While distress measures were modestly, but significantly associated with these deaths, the associations were similar in magnitude for many other types of mortality. In contrast, detachment from the labor force and lower social integration were both strongly associated with drug/alcohol/suicide mortality, more than for many other types of mortality. Differences in the estimated percentage dying of despair between age 25 and 65 were larger for employment status (2.0% for individuals who were neither employed nor retired versus only 0.6% for currently employed) and for social integration (1.9% for low versus 0.7% for high integration) than for negative affect (1.2% for high versus 0.8% for no negative affect). Most of the association between distress and drug/alcohol/suicide mortality appeared to result from confounding with structural factors and with pre-existing health conditions that may influence both the perception of distress and mortality risk. While deaths of despair result from self-destructive behavior, our results suggest that structural factors may be more important determinants than subjective distress.
“美国因药物/酒精/自杀导致的死亡率上升与绝望有关”这一说法似乎表明情绪困扰是导致这一现象的原因。然而,涂尔干的方法认为,潜在的结构性因素塑造了个体的行为和情绪。尽管关于“绝望致死”的文献不断增加,但没有一项研究直接比较了痛苦和结构性因素对“绝望致死”和其他死亡原因的影响。本研究使用美国中年研究的数据进行分析,该研究有大约 26 年的死亡率随访结果。我们评估了心理或经济困扰、就业状况和社会融合是否与药物/酒精/自杀死亡率的相关性比与其他死亡原因的相关性更强。调整潜在混杂因素后,Cox 风险模型显示,心理或经济困扰与药物/酒精/自杀相关的死亡率之间的关联并不强于其他原因的死亡率。虽然痛苦指标与这些死亡事件有一定的关联,但关联的强度与许多其他类型的死亡率相似。相比之下,与劳动力脱节和社会融合程度较低都与药物/酒精/自杀死亡率密切相关,这种关联比与许多其他类型的死亡率的关联更密切。25 岁至 65 岁之间因“绝望致死”的比例估计值之间的差异,就业状况(未就业或退休的个体为 2.0%,而目前就业的个体为 0.6%)和社会融合(低融合的个体为 1.9%,高融合的个体为 0.7%)的差异大于负面情绪(高负面情绪的个体为 1.2%,无负面情绪的个体为 0.8%)。痛苦与药物/酒精/自杀死亡率之间的关联主要归因于与结构性因素和可能影响痛苦和死亡风险感知的现有健康状况的混杂。虽然“绝望致死”是由自我毁灭行为引起的,但我们的研究结果表明,结构性因素可能比主观痛苦更重要的决定因素。