Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S187-S193. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.062. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who have prior meniscectomy may have increased rates of postoperative infection, arthrofibrosis, and revision. However, aside from an increased risk of complications, it is unclear whether prior meniscectomy impacts functional outcomes after TKA. This study was conducted to compare functional outcomes following TKA in patients who did and did not have a prior meniscectomy. We hypothesized that patients who had a prior ipsilateral meniscectomy would have worse functional outcomes after undergoing TKA.
A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. Patients who underwent both meniscectomy and TKA (cases) or TKA alone (controls) from 2013 to 2020 were identified from our institutional database using current procedural terminology codes. Cases were matched in a 1:3 ratio to controls using age, sex, race, body mass index, and a comorbidity index. Inclusion criteria comprised a minimum of 1-year follow-up for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (KOOS-JR). Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing revision TKA and patients who had a history of ligamentous knee surgery or fracture. T- and Chi-squared analyses were conducted, with significance threshold being P < .05. A total of 589 cases and 1,767 controls were included after matching. There were no significant differences in demographic variables. Cases underwent TKA after their meniscectomy at a mean of 2.9 years (range: 42 days to 16 years).
While no significant difference existed for preoperative KOOS-JR scores (46.4 versus 46.4; P = .984), postoperative KOOS-JR scores were significantly lower in the case group (71.9 versus 75.3; P = .001). The case group also achieved the KOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at significantly lower rates than the control group [(MCID: 71.0 versus 77.3%; P = .011) (PASS: 69.4 versus 76.7%; P = .001);].
Patients who had a prior meniscectomy may experience lower postoperative functional outcome scores after TKA and had a lower rate of achieving the MCID and PASS for KOOS-JR. Patient expectations should be adjusted accordingly.
接受全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 的患者,如果有半月板切除术史,可能会增加术后感染、关节纤维化和翻修的风险。然而,除了并发症风险增加之外,半月板切除术是否会影响 TKA 后的功能结果尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较有和没有半月板切除术史的 TKA 患者的功能结果。我们假设,接受过同侧半月板切除术的患者在接受 TKA 后功能结果会更差。
在一家三级学术中心进行了回顾性匹配病例对照研究。我们使用当前程序术语 (CPT) 代码从我们的机构数据库中确定了 2013 年至 2020 年期间接受半月板切除术和 TKA (病例) 或仅 TKA (对照) 的患者。使用年龄、性别、种族、体重指数和合并症指数,对病例进行了 1:3 比例的匹配。纳入标准包括至少有 1 年的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分青少年 (KOOS-JR) 随访。排除标准包括接受翻修 TKA 的患者和有膝关节韧带手术或骨折史的患者。进行了 T 检验和卡方检验,显著性阈值为 P <.05。匹配后共纳入 589 例病例和 1767 例对照,两组患者的人口统计学变量无显著差异。病例在半月板切除术后平均 2.9 年 (范围:42 天至 16 年) 行 TKA。
虽然术前 KOOS-JR 评分无显著差异 (46.4 分比 46.4 分;P =.984),但病例组术后 KOOS-JR 评分明显较低 (71.9 分比 75.3 分;P =.001)。病例组达到 KOOS-JR 最小临床重要差异 (MCID) 和患者可接受症状状态 (PASS) 的比例也明显低于对照组 [(MCID:71.0 分比 77.3%;P =.011) (PASS:69.4 分比 76.7%;P =.001)。]
有半月板切除术史的患者在接受 TKA 后可能会经历较低的术后功能结果评分,并且达到 KOOS-JR 的 MCID 和 PASS 的比例较低。应相应调整患者的预期。