Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023 Jul-Aug;64(4):349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Individuals with bipolar disorder commonly present for treatment in primary care settings. Collaborative care and colocated specialty care models can improve quality of care and outcomes, though it is unknown which model is more effective.
To compare 12-month treatment outcomes for primary care patients with bipolar disorder randomized to treatment with collaborative care or colocated specialty care.
We conducted a secondary analysis of 191 patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder treated for 12 months during a comparative effectiveness trial in 12 Federally Qualified Health Centers in three states. Characteristics and outcomes were assessed at enrollment and 12 months. The primary outcome was mental health quality of life scores (Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Health Component Summary), and secondary outcomes included depression and anxiety symptom scores, euthymic mood state, and recovery. T-tests and multiple linear and logistic regression models were used.
Among participants (mean age: 40 years; 73% women), the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Health Component Summary increased in both arms over 12 months (baseline: collaborative care 21.99, SD 10.78; colocated specialty 24.15, SD 12.05; 12-month collaborative care 30.63, SD 13.33; colocated specialty 34.16, SD 12.65). The mean Mental Health Component Summary change did not differ by arm (collaborative care: MΔ = 9.09; colocated specialty: MΔ = 10.73; t = -0.67, P = 0.50). Secondary outcomes also improved at 12 months compared to baseline measured by the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (MΔ = -0.75; SD = 0.85), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (MΔ = -3.92; SD = 6.48), and Recovery Assessment Scale (MΔ = 0.37; SD = 0.65) and did not differ significantly by arm. The proportion of participants with euthymic mood state increased from 11% to 25% with no statistically significant difference by arm.
The effectiveness of collaborative care and that of colocated specialty care were similar. Both were associated with substantial improvements in mental health quality of life and symptom reduction.
患有双相情感障碍的个体通常在初级保健环境中接受治疗。协作式护理和专科共同护理模式可以改善护理质量和结果,但尚不清楚哪种模式更有效。
比较随机分配至协作式护理或专科共同护理的双相情感障碍的初级保健患者的 12 个月治疗结果。
我们对在三个州的 12 个联邦合格健康中心进行的一项比较有效性试验中接受 12 个月治疗的 191 名双相情感障碍患者进行了二次分析。在入组时和 12 个月时评估特征和结局。主要结局是心理健康生活质量评分(退伍军人 RAND 12 项健康调查心理健康成分综合评分),次要结局包括抑郁和焦虑症状评分、心境稳定状态和康复。采用 t 检验和多元线性和逻辑回归模型。
在参与者中(平均年龄:40 岁;73%为女性),退伍军人 RAND 12 项健康调查心理健康成分综合评分在两个治疗组在 12 个月内均增加(基线:协作式护理组 21.99,SD 10.78;专科共同护理组 24.15,SD 12.05;12 个月协作式护理组 30.63,SD 13.33;专科共同护理组 34.16,SD 12.65)。手臂间的平均心理健康成分综合评分变化无差异(协作式护理:MΔ=9.09;专科共同护理:MΔ=10.73;t=-0.67,P=0.50)。与基线相比,12 个月时使用 Hopkins 症状清单(MΔ=-0.75;SD=0.85)、广泛性焦虑症 7 项(MΔ=-3.92;SD=6.48)和康复评估量表(MΔ=0.37;SD=0.65)测量的次要结局也有所改善,并且手臂间差异无统计学意义。心境稳定状态的参与者比例从 11%增加到 25%,但手臂间无统计学差异。
协作式护理和专科共同护理的效果相似。两者都与心理健康生活质量的显著改善和症状减轻有关。