State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Key Laboratory of Eco-Environment-Related Polymer Materials Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Ministry of Gansu Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 May 1;871:162107. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162107. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
The alternative flame retardants, novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) and organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) are ubiquitous in the environment and biota and may induce endocrine disruption effects. Associations between traditional endocrine-disrupting chemicals and type 2 diabetes have been extensively reported in epidemiological studies. However, the effects of NBFRs and OPFRs in humans have not been reported to date. This paper reports a case-control study of 344 participants aged 25-80 years from Shandong Province, East China, where potential associations between serum NBFR and OPFR concentrations and type 2 diabetes are assessed for the first time. After adjusting for covariates (i.e., age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, triglycerides, and total cholesterol), serum concentrations of pentabromotoluene, 2,3-dibromopropyl 2,4,6-tribromophenyl ether, tri-n-propyl phosphate, triphenyl phosphate, and tris (2-ethylhexyl) phosphate were significantly positively associated with type 2 diabetes. In the control group, decabromodiphenyl ethane and triphenyl phosphate were significantly positively associated with fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In the quantile g-computation model, significant positive mixture effect was found between the flame retardants mixtures and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and decabromodiphenyl ethane contributed the largest positive weights to the mixture effect. Overall, these findings suggest that exposure to NBFRs and OPFRs may promote type 2 diabetes.
替代型阻燃剂,新型溴化阻燃剂(NBFRs)和有机磷阻燃剂(OPFRs)在环境和生物群中无处不在,可能会引发内分泌干扰效应。流行病学研究广泛报道了传统内分泌干扰化学物质与 2 型糖尿病之间的关联。然而,迄今为止,尚未有关于 NBFRs 和 OPFRs 对人类影响的报道。本文报告了一项针对中国华东地区山东省 344 名年龄在 25-80 岁的参与者的病例对照研究,首次评估了血清 NBFR 和 OPFR 浓度与 2 型糖尿病之间的潜在关联。在调整了协变量(即年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟状况、饮酒量、甘油三酯和总胆固醇)后,五溴甲苯、2,3-二溴丙基 2,4,6-三溴苯基醚、磷酸三正丙酯、磷酸三苯酯和磷酸三(2-乙基己基)酯的血清浓度与 2 型糖尿病呈显著正相关。在对照组中,十溴联苯醚和磷酸三苯酯与空腹血糖、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇呈显著正相关。在分位数 g 计算模型中,发现阻燃剂混合物与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平之间存在显著的正混合效应,而十溴联苯醚对混合效应的贡献最大。总体而言,这些发现表明接触 NBFRs 和 OPFRs 可能会促进 2 型糖尿病的发生。