Suppr超能文献

患者对腰椎退行性滑脱手术的期望:来自加拿大脊柱结果和研究网络(CSORN)的手术类型和患者因素分析。

Patient's expectations of surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis by type of surgery and patient factors from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

London Health Science Centre, Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Lawson Health Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Spine J. 2023 Jun;23(6):805-815. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preoperative expectations influence postoperative outcomes. Patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis have especially high expectations of pain relief and overall functional well-being compared to patients with lumbar stenosis.

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to analyze preoperative expectations of lumbar DS patients with respect to the type of surgery proposed (decompression vs decompression and fusion). Secondarily, we aimed to assess the associations between preoperative expectations and patient and clinical factors as well as postoperative expectations fulfillment.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Patients were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, prospective cohort study evaluating the assessment and management of degenerative spondylolisthesis utilizing the infrastructure of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) surgical registry.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with a diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis with symptoms of neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy with or without back pain, unresponsive to nonoperative management over at least 3 months were included. Patients who underwent decompression, decompression and posterolateral fusion or decompression and interbody fusion at Canadian spine centers between January 2015 and September 2021 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Questionnaire was utilized for expectations measurement. The expectation questionnaire was completed following consent and before surgery and at 1 year.

METHODS

Expectations for pain relief and improvements in overall functional well-being were rated on a scale of 0 to 100. Preoperative expectation in terms of pain relief and functional well-being score were calculated. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between expected preoperative patient factors and pain relief and functional well-being. The factors associated with the most important expectation were evaluated using multivariable multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-two patients were included with 100 patients undergoing decompression and 252 patients also undergoing fusion. The seven items of preoperative expectations did not differ between the procedure groups nor did expected change. The mean pain relief and overall functional well-being expectation scores did not significantly differ between procedures. Higher expectations were associated with having more comorbidities [β=-2.0 (SE 0.8), p=.020], being physically active [β=8.4 (SE 3.2), p=.010] and having more leg pain [β=1.6 (SE 0.7), p=.015]. Better perceived physical health measured by SF12 PCS was associated with lower expectation of pain relief [β= -0.4 (SE 0.2), p=.039] and functional well-being [β=-0.84 (SE 0.2), p=.001]. Better perceived mental health measured by SF12 MCS was associated with lower expectation of functional well-being [β=-0.8 (SE 0.2), p=.001]. Postoperative expectations fulfillment did not differ between procedures.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative expectations in terms of pain relief and functional well-being were similar between the two most common procedures performed, decompression ± fusion. Secondarily, higher preoperative expectations were associated with greater pain, disability and being physically active. Expectations fulfillment did not differ between procedures.

摘要

背景语境

术前预期会影响术后结果。与腰椎狭窄症患者相比,患有腰椎退变性脊椎滑脱的患者对缓解疼痛和整体功能康复的期望特别高。

目的

主要目的是分析腰椎 DS 患者对拟议手术类型(减压与减压融合)的术前预期。其次,我们旨在评估术前预期与患者和临床因素以及术后预期实现之间的相关性。

研究设计/地点:前瞻性纳入多中心前瞻性队列研究,利用加拿大脊柱结果和研究网络(CSORN)手术登记处评估退行性脊椎滑脱的评估和管理。

患者样本

患有神经源性跛行或根性神经病症状的退变性脊椎滑脱症的患者,伴有或不伴有腰痛,经过至少 3 个月的非手术治疗后仍无反应。2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间在加拿大脊柱中心接受减压、减压和后路融合或减压和椎间融合的患者被纳入研究。

结果测量

北美脊柱协会腰椎问卷用于预期测量。在知情同意和手术前以及 1 年后完成了期望问卷。

方法

疼痛缓解和整体功能康复的预期在 0 到 100 之间评分。计算了术前预期的疼痛缓解和功能康复评分。使用多元线性回归评估预期术前患者因素与疼痛缓解和功能康复之间的关联。使用多变量多项逻辑回归评估与最重要的预期相关的因素。

结果

共纳入 352 例患者,其中 100 例接受减压治疗,252 例同时接受融合治疗。两组之间手术的七个术前预期项目没有差异,预期的变化也没有差异。两种手术方式的疼痛缓解和整体功能康复的预期评分没有显著差异。更高的预期与更多的合并症相关[β=-2.0(SE 0.8),p=.020],体力活动更多[β=8.4(SE 3.2),p=.010]和更多的腿部疼痛[β=1.6(SE 0.7),p=.015]。SF12 PCS 测量的更好的身体健康感知与疼痛缓解的期望较低相关[β=-0.4(SE 0.2),p=.039]和功能康复的期望较低[β=-0.84(SE 0.2),p=.001]。SF12 MCS 测量的更好的心理健康感知与功能康复的期望较低相关[β=-0.8(SE 0.2),p=.001]。两种手术方式之间术后预期的满足度没有差异。

结论

两种最常见的手术(减压±融合)之间的术前预期在疼痛缓解和功能康复方面相似。其次,较高的术前预期与更大的疼痛、残疾和体力活动有关。两种手术方式之间术后预期的满足度没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验