Center for Education and Training, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Breast Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Center for Education and Training, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 Apr;35(4):255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
The current gold standard of treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. However, the increased detection and radical treatment of DCIS did not result in a declined incidence of invasive breast cancers, leading to the debate if DCIS has been overtreated. While ongoing randomised controlled trials on active surveillance of DCIS are still in progress, this systematic review aims to evaluate the best evidence on conservative treatment for DCIS from the literature.
This systematic review was conducted in line with the PRISMA statement. We included all relevant studies published up to June 2022 for analysis. The primary outcomes were overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of conservative treatment for DCIS.
Three studies, with a total of 34 007 women with low-risk DCIS, were included in the analysis. Active and conservative treatments both resulted in excellent 10-year BCSS, with no statistically insignificant difference (98.6% versus 96.0%, 31 478 women). One study comparing 5-year BCSS of active and conservative treatments only in subjects aged over 80 years also reported [AQ1]an insignificant difference (98.2% versus 96.0%, 2529 women). One study measuring 5- and 10-year overall survival between the treatment groups also reported [AQ1]an insignificant difference (5-year: 96.2% versus 92.4%; 10-year: 85.6% versus 86.7%, 31 106 women).
BCSS between active and conservative treatment for women with low-risk DCIS is both excellent and comparable, suggesting that conservative treatment is a possible alternative without compromising survival.
导管原位癌(DCIS)的当前金标准治疗方法是手术切除加或不加辅助放疗。然而,DCIS 的检出率和根治性治疗的增加并没有导致浸润性乳腺癌发病率的下降,这引发了关于 DCIS 是否过度治疗的争论。虽然正在进行的关于 DCIS 主动监测的随机对照试验仍在进行中,但本系统评价旨在从文献中评估保守治疗 DCIS 的最佳证据。
本系统评价按照 PRISMA 声明进行。我们纳入了截至 2022 年 6 月所有相关研究进行分析。主要结局是保守治疗 DCIS 的总生存率和乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)。
共纳入了 3 项研究,总计 34007 例低危 DCIS 女性。积极治疗和保守治疗均能获得出色的 10 年 BCSS,无统计学显著差异(98.6%比 96.0%,31478 例女性)。一项比较 80 岁以上患者的主动治疗和保守治疗 5 年 BCSS 的研究也报告了[AQ1]无统计学显著差异(98.2%比 96.0%,2529 例女性)。一项研究还测量了治疗组之间的 5 年和 10 年总生存率,也报告了[AQ1]无统计学显著差异(5 年:96.2%比 92.4%;10 年:85.6%比 86.7%,31106 例女性)。
低危 DCIS 女性的主动治疗和保守治疗的 BCSS 均非常出色且相当,这表明保守治疗是一种可行的替代方案,而不会影响生存率。