Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology & Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has drastically increased over the past decades. Because DCIS is resected after diagnosis similar to invasive breast cancer, the natural cause and behaviour of DCIS is not well known. We aimed to determine breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) according to grade in DCIS patients after surgical treatment in the Netherlands.
All DCIS patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2012 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The cause of death was obtained from 'Statistics Netherlands'. BCSS and OS were estimated using multivariable Cox regression in the entire cohort and stratified for grades.
In total, 12,256 patients were included, of whom 1509 (12.3%) presented with grade I, 3675 (30.0%) with grade II, 6064 (49.5%) with grade III and 1008 (8.2%) with an unknown grade. During a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 1138 (9.3%) deaths were observed, and 179 (1.5%) were breast cancer-related. Of these, 10 patients had grade I; 46 grade II; 95 grade III and 28 an unknown grade. After adjustment for confounding, grade II and III were related to worse BCSS than grade I with hazard ratios of 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-3.81) and 2.14 (95% CI: 1.11-4.12), respectively. No association between grades and OS was observed.
BCSS and OS in DCIS patients were excellent. Because superior rates were observed for low-grade DCIS, it seems justified to investigate whether active surveillance may be a balanced alternative for conventional surgical treatment.
在过去几十年中,导管原位癌(DCIS)的发病率急剧上升。由于 DCIS 在诊断后与浸润性乳腺癌一样被切除,因此人们对 DCIS 的自然病因和行为知之甚少。我们旨在确定荷兰接受手术治疗的 DCIS 患者的乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)和总生存率(OS)与分级的关系。
从荷兰癌症登记处选择了 1999 年至 2012 年期间诊断为 DCIS 的所有患者。通过“荷兰统计局”获取死亡原因。使用多变量 Cox 回归对整个队列进行分析,并根据分级进行分层,以估计 BCSS 和 OS。
共纳入 12256 例患者,其中 1509 例(12.3%)为 I 级,3675 例(30.0%)为 II 级,6064 例(49.5%)为 III 级,1008 例(8.2%)为未知等级。中位随访 7.8 年后,观察到 1138 例死亡,其中 179 例(1.5%)与乳腺癌相关。其中 10 例为 I 级,46 例为 II 级,95 例为 III 级,28 例为未知等级。在调整混杂因素后,II 级和 III 级的 BCSS 均较 I 级差,风险比分别为 1.92(95%置信区间[CI]:0.97-3.81)和 2.14(95% CI:1.11-4.12)。未观察到分级与 OS 之间存在关联。
DCIS 患者的 BCSS 和 OS 非常好。由于低级别 DCIS 的比例较高,因此似乎有理由研究主动监测是否可以作为传统手术治疗的平衡替代方案。