• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防惩罚性暴力:在孟加拉国对边缘化群体实施日常育儿中的积极纪律(Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting,简称 PDEP)。

Preventing Punitive Violence: Implementing Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting (PDEP) with Marginalized Populations in Bangladesh.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.

Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031873.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20031873
PMID:36767241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914775/
Abstract

Physical and other types of punishment remain common in Bangladesh, despite overwhelming evidence of their harm and worldwide efforts to decrease their use. One of the strategic priorities of Save the Children in Bangladesh's Child Protection Program is to protect children from physical and humiliating punishment in homes, schools, and other settings. Save the Children in Bangladesh selected the Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting (PDEP) Program to provide parents with alternatives to physical punishment that comply with human rights standards while strengthening relationships and understanding of child development. High-risk communities where children are particularly vulnerable were selected for this project. The PDEP program was delivered to 857 parents living in lower socioeconomic areas of Bangladesh, including ethnic minority groups, and parents living in urban slums of Dhaka and rural brothel areas. Due to the low levels of education of the participants (almost two-thirds of participants had not completed elementary school), simplified pre and posttests were utilized. Following program completion, parents' approval of both physical punishment and punishment in general declined; they were less likely to view typical parent-child conflicts as intentional misbehavior and were less reactive to frustration. In addition, parents indicated an increased understanding of the positive discipline and more confidence in their parenting skills. Before taking PDEP, 64% of the parents often felt like they just did not know what to do as a parent, compared to 34% following program completion. PDEP demonstrated the potential to decrease the use of physical and humiliating punishments by parents living in high-risk communities in Bangladesh.

摘要

在孟加拉国,尽管有压倒性的证据表明身体和其他形式的惩罚会造成伤害,且全球范围内都在努力减少其使用,但这种惩罚仍然很常见。拯救儿童会孟加拉国儿童保护项目的战略重点之一是保护儿童免受家庭、学校和其他环境中的身体和羞辱性惩罚。拯救儿童会孟加拉国选择了日常育儿中的积极纪律(Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting,PDEP)项目,为父母提供了替代身体惩罚的方法,这些方法符合人权标准,同时加强了亲子关系和对儿童发展的理解。该项目选择了儿童特别容易受到伤害的高风险社区。该 PDEP 项目针对 857 名生活在孟加拉国社会经济水平较低地区的父母(包括少数民族群体)以及生活在达卡市区贫民窟和农村妓院地区的父母开展。由于参与者的教育水平较低(近三分之二的参与者没有完成小学教育),因此使用了简化的预测试和后测试。在项目完成后,父母对身体惩罚和一般惩罚的认可程度都有所下降;他们不太可能将典型的亲子冲突视为故意的不良行为,对挫折的反应也不那么强烈。此外,父母表示对积极纪律的理解有所增加,对自己的育儿技能也更有信心。在参加 PDEP 之前,64%的父母经常觉得自己作为父母不知道该怎么做,而在项目完成后,这一比例下降到 34%。PDEP 表明,它有可能减少生活在孟加拉国高风险社区的父母使用身体和羞辱性惩罚的行为。

相似文献

1
Preventing Punitive Violence: Implementing Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting (PDEP) with Marginalized Populations in Bangladesh.预防惩罚性暴力:在孟加拉国对边缘化群体实施日常育儿中的积极纪律(Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting,简称 PDEP)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031873.
2
"Before I was like a Tarzan. But now, I take a pause": mixed methods feasibility study of the Naungan Kasih parenting program to prevent violence against children in Malaysia.“以前我像人猿泰山一样。但现在,我会暂停一下”:马来西亚“关爱之荫”亲职教育方案预防儿童暴力的混合方法可行性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 4;23(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15065-4.
3
Parenting and physical punishment: primary care interventions in Latin America.育儿与体罚:拉丁美洲的初级保健干预措施
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2000 Oct;8(4):257-67. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892000000900005.
4
A brief intervention affects parents' attitudes toward using less physical punishment.一次简短的干预会影响父母对减少体罚的态度。
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Dec;37(12):1192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
5
Physical violence against children with hearing loss by parents: A pilot study in Beijing, China.父母对听力损失儿童的身体暴力:中国北京的一项初步研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Oct;72:258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Does parental use of harsh discipline and punishment in response to ambiguous child situations vary by child physical abuse risk?父母在应对模棱两可的儿童情况时使用严厉的纪律和惩罚,是否会因儿童受虐待的风险而异?
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jul;153:106829. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106829. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
Corporal punishment and primary prevention of physical abuse.体罚与身体虐待的一级预防
Child Abuse Negl. 2000 Sep;24(9):1109-14. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00180-0.
8
The Families First Program to Prevent Child Abuse: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in West Java, Indonesia.《预防儿童虐待的家庭第一方案:在印度尼西亚西爪哇进行的一项群组随机对照试验的结果》。
Prev Sci. 2022 Nov;23(8):1457-1469. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01433-w. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
[The effect of a child abuse prevention program for parents with disabled children].[针对残疾儿童家长的儿童虐待预防项目的效果]
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2004 Aug;34(5):663-72. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2004.34.5.663.
10
A qualitative evaluation of the mechanisms of action in an early childhood parenting programme to prevent violence against children in Jamaica.对牙买加一项预防暴力侵害儿童行为的幼儿养育计划作用机制的定性评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2023 May;49(3):579-590. doi: 10.1111/cch.13074. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical punishment and child outcomes: a narrative review of prospective studies.身体惩罚与儿童发展后果:前瞻性研究的叙述性综述。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 24;398(10297):355-364. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00582-1. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Physical Discipline, Deprivation, and Differential Risk of Developmental Delay Across 17 Countries.身体惩戒、剥夺与 17 个国家发展迟缓的差异风险。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;60(2):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
3
Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses.打屁股与儿童成长结果:旧争议与新的元分析
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Jun;30(4):453-69. doi: 10.1037/fam0000191. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Change in Corporal Punishment Over Time in a Representative Sample of Canadian Parents.加拿大父母代表性样本中体罚随时间的变化
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Aug;29(4):507-17. doi: 10.1037/fam0000104.
5
Maternal use of physical punishment in response to child misbehavior: implications for child abuse prevention.母亲对孩子行为不端采取体罚的应对方式:对预防儿童虐待的启示。
Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Feb;29(2):169-85. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.10.010.
6
Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989.《儿童权利公约》,1989年11月20日。
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:95, 485-501.