Ndikumukiza Malachie, Xiao Yu-Ting, Ye You-Fan, Wang Jia-Song, Peng Xi, Xie Hua-Tao, Zhang Ming-Chang
Department of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 22;12(3):877. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030877.
Blepharospasm patients often have dry eye manifestations. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injection has been the main management for blepharospasm and absorbable punctal plug (APP) insertion is shown to be effective in the treatment of dry eye. However, there have been no studies investigating the combined treatment of BoNT-A and APP in blepharospasm patients with dry eye. In this retrospective study, 17 blepharospasm patients with dry eye treated by BoNT-A injection and 12 receiving BoNT-A plus APP treatment were enrolled. The efficacy was evaluated according to the Jankovic rating scale, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), fluorescein staining (FL), fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT) and Schirmer I test (SIT). Both BoNT-A and BoNT-A+APP treatment effectively reduced the functional impairment of blepharospasm. At baseline, all the patients had high OSDI scores (BoNT-A group: 82.48 ± 7.37, BoNT-A+APP group: 78.82 ± 4.60, = 0.112), but relatively low degrees of FL (BoNT-A group: 3.18 ± 1.01, BoNT-A+APP group: 3.50 ± 1.24, = 0.466), FBUT (BoNT-A group: 1.71 ± 0.77, BoNT-A+APP group: 2.17 ± 0.58, = 0.077) and SIT (BoNT-A group: 2.53 ± 0.99, BoNT-A+APP group: 3.17 ± 1.23, = 0.153). After treatment, OSDI, FL, FBUT and SIT were all obviously restored in the two groups. When comparing the changing rates, only OSDI (BoNT-A group: -52.23% ± 15.57%, BoNT-A+APP group: -61.84% ± 9.10%, = 0.047) and FL (BoNT-A group: -22.55% ± 25.98%, BoNT-A+APP group: -41.94% ± 14.46%, = 0.016) showed significant differences between the two groups. This study suggests that OSDI is not applicable in the diagnosis of dry eye among blepharospasm patients. For blepharospasm patients with severe dry eye symptoms, especially those with fluorescein staining in the cornea, the combined treatment of BoNT-A and APP is more effective than using BoNT-A alone.
眼睑痉挛患者常伴有干眼表现。A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素(BoNT-A)注射一直是治疗眼睑痉挛的主要方法,而插入可吸收泪点塞(APP)已被证明对治疗干眼有效。然而,尚无研究探讨BoNT-A与APP联合治疗干眼的眼睑痉挛患者的疗效。在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了17例接受BoNT-A注射治疗的干眼眼睑痉挛患者和12例接受BoNT-A加APP治疗的患者。根据扬科维奇评分量表、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)、荧光素染色(FL)、荧光素泪膜破裂时间(FBUT)和泪液分泌试验(SIT)评估疗效。BoNT-A和BoNT-A+APP治疗均有效减轻了眼睑痉挛的功能障碍。基线时,所有患者的OSDI评分均较高(BoNT-A组:82.48±7.37,BoNT-A+APP组:78.82±4.60,P=0.112),但FL程度相对较低(BoNT-A组:3.18±1.01,BoNT-A+APP组:3.50±1.24,P=0.466),FBUT(BoNT-A组:1.71±0.77,BoNT-A+APP组:2.17±0.58,P=0.077)和SIT(BoNT-A组:2.53±0.99,BoNT-A+APP组:3.17±1.23,P=0.153)。治疗后,两组的OSDI、FL、FBUT和SIT均明显恢复。比较变化率时,只有OSDI(BoNT-A组:-52.23%±15.57%,BoNT-A+APP组:-61.84%±9.10%,P=0.047)和FL(BoNT-A组:-22.55%±25.98%,BoNT-A+APP组:-41.94%±14.46%,P=0.016)在两组之间存在显著差异。本研究表明,OSDI不适用于眼睑痉挛患者干眼的诊断。对于干眼症状严重的眼睑痉挛患者,尤其是角膜有荧光素染色的患者,BoNT-A与APP联合治疗比单独使用BoNT-A更有效。