• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种分析干热岩水力压裂重新开启压力的创新方法。

An Innovative Method to Analyze the Hydraulic Fracture Reopening Pressure of Hot Dry Rock.

作者信息

Zhuang Deng-Deng, Yin Tu-Bing, Zhang Zong-Xian, Aladejare Adeyemi, Wu You, Qiao Yang

机构信息

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.

Oulu Mining School, University of Oulu, 90015 Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;16(3):1118. doi: 10.3390/ma16031118.

DOI:10.3390/ma16031118
PMID:36770127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9919164/
Abstract

This paper focuses on a new test method and theoretical model for measuring and evaluating the reopening pressure during hot dry rock hydraulic fracturing. Firstly, rock blocks of four lithologies were collected from the hot dry rock strata. Hydraulic fracturing tests at high temperatures in real-time were conducted using drilled cubic specimens and drilled cubic specimens with a pre-crack. Breakdown pressure, reopening pressure, and fracture toughness were measured, respectively. In addition, Brazilian splitting tests at high temperatures in real-time were performed using Brazilian disc specimens to measure tensile strength. Secondly, an empirical equation for evaluating the reopening pressure during hot dry rock secondary fracturing was developed based on fracture mechanics and hydraulic fracturing theory. Third, the values calculated by the new equation, considering breakdown pressure, fracture toughness, and tensile strength, were compared to the values determined by the classical equation and to measurement results. It was found that the new equation predicted closer reopening pressure to the measurement results, regardless of the lithology of the hot dry rock. Moreover, with increasing temperature in the specimens, the error between the value calculated by the new equation and the measurement value remained low. In contrast, the difference between the classical equation predictions and the measurement results was widened. In addition, the reopening pressure was positively correlated with tensile strength and fracture toughness. Variations in lithology and temperature affected tensile strength and fracture toughness, which then changed the hot dry rock reopening pressure.

摘要

本文重点研究了一种用于测量和评估热干岩水力压裂过程中重张压力的新测试方法和理论模型。首先,从热干岩地层采集了四种岩性的岩块。使用钻孔立方体试件和带有预制裂缝的钻孔立方体试件进行了高温实时水力压裂试验,分别测量了破裂压力、重张压力和断裂韧性。此外,使用巴西圆盘试件进行了高温实时巴西劈裂试验以测量抗拉强度。其次,基于断裂力学和水力压裂理论,建立了一个评估热干岩二次压裂过程中重张压力的经验方程。第三,将考虑破裂压力、断裂韧性和抗拉强度的新方程计算值与经典方程确定的值以及测量结果进行了比较。结果发现,无论热干岩的岩性如何,新方程预测的重张压力与测量结果更接近。此外,随着试件温度升高,新方程计算值与测量值之间的误差保持在较低水平。相比之下,经典方程预测值与测量结果之间的差异则增大。另外,重张压力与抗拉强度和断裂韧性呈正相关。岩性和温度的变化影响了抗拉强度和断裂韧性,进而改变了热干岩的重张压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/d28f5c1ff432/materials-16-01118-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/cecaff48acfe/materials-16-01118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/b322ebf316d2/materials-16-01118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/e4067af2ddb7/materials-16-01118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/e5d3a9b483ee/materials-16-01118-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/534181df174a/materials-16-01118-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/efd4721262bc/materials-16-01118-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/b3fd4b398050/materials-16-01118-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/e8603248bb74/materials-16-01118-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/c34681cd70db/materials-16-01118-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/f8129d723627/materials-16-01118-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/3ac4a43aca72/materials-16-01118-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/13621c74489e/materials-16-01118-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/5eab1588d3b1/materials-16-01118-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/affbe3bd4f3d/materials-16-01118-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/76dc771d20ec/materials-16-01118-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/1c1b0bec7a0e/materials-16-01118-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/b3816d7d44ed/materials-16-01118-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/d28f5c1ff432/materials-16-01118-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/cecaff48acfe/materials-16-01118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/b322ebf316d2/materials-16-01118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/e4067af2ddb7/materials-16-01118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/e5d3a9b483ee/materials-16-01118-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/534181df174a/materials-16-01118-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/efd4721262bc/materials-16-01118-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/b3fd4b398050/materials-16-01118-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/e8603248bb74/materials-16-01118-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/c34681cd70db/materials-16-01118-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/f8129d723627/materials-16-01118-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/3ac4a43aca72/materials-16-01118-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/13621c74489e/materials-16-01118-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/5eab1588d3b1/materials-16-01118-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/affbe3bd4f3d/materials-16-01118-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/76dc771d20ec/materials-16-01118-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/1c1b0bec7a0e/materials-16-01118-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/b3816d7d44ed/materials-16-01118-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99eb/9919164/d28f5c1ff432/materials-16-01118-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
An Innovative Method to Analyze the Hydraulic Fracture Reopening Pressure of Hot Dry Rock.一种分析干热岩水力压裂重新开启压力的创新方法。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;16(3):1118. doi: 10.3390/ma16031118.
2
Machine Learning-Based Accelerated Approaches to Infer Breakdown Pressure of Several Unconventional Rock Types.基于机器学习的加速方法推断几种非常规岩石类型的破裂压力
ACS Omega. 2022 Nov 4;7(45):41314-41330. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05066. eCollection 2022 Nov 15.
3
Experimental study on the breakdown mechanism of high temperature granite induced by liquid nitrogen fracturing: An implication to geothermal reservoirs.液氮压裂诱导高温花岗岩破裂机制的实验研究:对地热储层的启示
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 18;9(8):e19257. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19257. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Fracture propagation and pore pressure evolution characteristics induced by hydraulic and pneumatic fracturing of coal.煤体水力压裂与气压致裂的裂缝扩展及孔隙压力演化特征
Sci Rep. 2024 May 1;14(1):9992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60873-2.
5
Dicationic Surfactants as an Additive in Fracturing Fluids to Mitigate Clay Swelling: A Petrophysical and Rock Mechanical Assessment.双阳离子表面活性剂作为压裂液中的添加剂以减轻粘土膨胀:岩石物理与岩石力学评估
ACS Omega. 2021 Jun 10;6(24):15867-15877. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01388. eCollection 2021 Jun 22.
6
Mechanical Characteristics and Permeability Characteristics of Dry-Hot Rock Mass.干热岩体的力学特性与渗透特性。
J Environ Public Health. 2023 Jul 7;2023:5298404. doi: 10.1155/2023/5298404. eCollection 2023.
7
A new chart of hydraulic fracture height prediction based on fluid-solid coupling equations and rock fracture mechanics.一种基于流固耦合方程和岩石断裂力学的水力压裂裂缝高度预测新图表。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Oct 10;5(10):180600. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180600. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Experimental analysis of multiple factors on hydraulic fracturing in coalbed methane reservoirs.对煤层气储层水力压裂中多种因素的实验分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195363. eCollection 2018.
9
Time-Dependent Effect of Seepage Force on Initiation of Hydraulic Fracture around a Vertical Wellbore.渗流力对垂直井筒周围水力压裂起裂的时变效应
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;16(5):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma16052012.
10
Hydraulic Fracturing Experiment Investigation for the Application of Geothermal Energy Extraction.用于地热能开采的水力压裂实验研究
ACS Omega. 2020 Apr 7;5(15):8667-8686. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00172. eCollection 2020 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The Shear Mechanisms of Natural Fractures during the Hydraulic Stimulation of Shale Gas Reservoirs.页岩气藏水力增产过程中天然裂缝的剪切机制
Materials (Basel). 2016 Aug 23;9(9):713. doi: 10.3390/ma9090713.