Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, France.
Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France.
Breast. 2023 Apr;68:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
Taxanes are major drugs for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment, and are generally well tolerated, making them attractive for therapeutic reintroduction (rechallenge) during metastatic course. In view of the paucity of current literature, we questioned the usefulness of taxane rechallenge in a population of patients previously treated with taxanes in a metastatic setting.
From the local database of a French cancer center, we retrospectively identified 756 patients diagnosed with ER+/HER2-, or triple negative MBC, and treated between 2008 and 2021. Among them, 58 patients (7.8%) were rechallenged with taxanes. Clinical characteristics, response rates, and survival were retrospectively evaluated and compared to patients who received taxanes only once.
Compared to non-rechallenged population, patients treated with taxane rechallenge were significantly younger, with better general status, and received more treatment. First taxane exposure led to better tumor response and was more frequently discontinued for reasons other than progression, compared to the non-rechallenged population. Taxane rechallenge led to an objective response rate of 27.6%, and a clinical benefit rate of 46.6%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.7 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 11.6 months. We also found a PFS2/PFS1 ratio >1.3 in 55.2% of the rechallenge population.
Although only a minority of MBC patients are concerned, taxane rechallenge appears to be a pragmatic option with an acceptable tolerance, and good efficacy, especially when these drugs have shown clinical activity earlier in the disease course, and/or have been stopped for reasons other than progression.
紫杉烷类药物是转移性乳腺癌(MBC)治疗的主要药物,通常具有良好的耐受性,因此在转移性疾病过程中重新引入(重新挑战)治疗具有吸引力。鉴于目前文献有限,我们质疑紫杉烷类药物重新挑战在既往转移性环境中接受紫杉烷类药物治疗的患者人群中的有效性。
我们从法国癌症中心的本地数据库中回顾性地确定了 756 名 ER+/HER2-或三阴性 MBC 患者,这些患者在 2008 年至 2021 年间接受了治疗。其中,58 名患者(7.8%)接受了紫杉烷类药物重新挑战。回顾性评估了临床特征、缓解率和生存率,并与仅接受过一次紫杉烷类药物治疗的患者进行了比较。
与未接受重新挑战的人群相比,接受紫杉烷类药物重新挑战的患者明显更年轻,一般状况更好,接受的治疗更多。与未接受重新挑战的人群相比,首次紫杉烷类药物暴露导致更好的肿瘤反应,并且更频繁地因除进展以外的原因停药。紫杉烷类药物重新挑战的客观缓解率为 27.6%,临床获益率为 46.6%,无进展生存期(PFS)为 5.7 个月,总生存期(OS)为 11.6 个月。我们还发现重新挑战人群中有 55.2%的 PFS2/PFS1 比值>1.3。
尽管只有少数 MBC 患者受到影响,但紫杉烷类药物重新挑战似乎是一种实用的选择,具有可接受的耐受性和良好的疗效,尤其是当这些药物在疾病早期就表现出临床活性,并且/或者因除进展以外的原因停药时。