Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Breast. 2022 Oct;65:136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
Taxanes are one of the most effective chemotherapies (CT) in breast cancer (BC), but the efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse has been poorly studied in patients previously treated by taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Our study aimed to analyse the efficacy of taxane rechallenge in case of early metastatic relapse in a multicentre retrospective observational study compared with other chemotherapies.
We analysed the French national ESME metastatic BC (MBC) database and selected HER2- MBC patients who received CT in first-line treatment for a metastatic relapse occurring 3-24 months after previous (neo)adjuvant taxanes treatment.
Of 23,501 female patients with MBC in ESME, 1057 met the selection criteria. 58.4% received a taxane-based regimen (75.4% concomitant bevacizumab) and 41.6% received other CT. In hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- MBC, multivariate analysis showed no difference in OS between taxanes without bevacizumab compared to other CT (HZR = 1.3 [0.97; 1.74], but taxanes was significantly associated with worse PFS (HZR = 1.48 [1.14; 1.93]). In TNBC, taxanes without bevacizumab and carboplatin/gemcitabine were not superior to other CT for OS (HZR = 1.07 [0.79; 1.44] and HZR = 0.81 [0.58; 1.13], respectively), while for PFS, taxanes was inferior (HZR = 1.33 [1.06-1.67]) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine was superior to other CT (HZR = 0.63 [0.46; 0.87]). For both subtypes, the worse outcome observed with paclitaxel was no longer observed with the addition of bevacizumab.
With the limitation of retrospective design, taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- MBC, which was not observed with the addition of bevacizumab.
紫杉烷类药物是乳腺癌(BC)最有效的化疗药物之一,但在新辅助治疗中接受紫杉烷类药物治疗的患者中,早期转移性复发时紫杉烷类药物再挑战的疗效尚未得到充分研究。我们的研究旨在通过多中心回顾性观察性研究,分析紫杉烷类药物再挑战在早期转移性复发时的疗效,并与其他化疗药物进行比较。
我们分析了法国国家 ESME 转移性 BC(MBC)数据库,并选择了在先前(新辅助)紫杉烷类药物治疗后 3-24 个月发生转移性复发的 HER2-MBC 患者,他们在一线治疗中接受了 CT。
在 ESME 的 23501 名女性 MBC 患者中,有 1057 名符合入选标准。58.4%的患者接受了基于紫杉烷的方案(75.4%同时使用贝伐珠单抗),41.6%的患者接受了其他 CT。在激素受体阳性(HR+)/HER2-MBC 中,多变量分析显示,无贝伐珠单抗的紫杉烷类药物与其他 CT 相比,OS 无差异(HR=1.3[0.97;1.74]),但紫杉烷类药物与 PFS 显著相关(HR=1.48[1.14;1.93])。在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中,无贝伐珠单抗的紫杉烷类药物和卡铂/吉西他滨与其他 CT 相比,OS 并无优势(HR=1.07[0.79;1.44]和 HR=0.81[0.58;1.13]),而对于 PFS,紫杉烷类药物则处于劣势(HR=1.33[1.06-1.67]),卡铂联合吉西他滨优于其他 CT(HR=0.63[0.46;0.87])。对于这两种亚型,在添加贝伐珠单抗后,紫杉烷类药物引起的更差的结果不再观察到。
在回顾性设计的局限性下,BC 早期转移性复发时紫杉烷类药物再挑战可能导致 TNBC 和 HR+/HER2-MBC 的 PFS 更差,而添加贝伐珠单抗则不会观察到这种情况。