Suppr超能文献

不同固定方式下腰椎侧方椎间融合术对相邻节段退变影响的生物力学评估:有限元分析

Biomechanical Evaluation of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options for Adjacent Segment Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis.

作者信息

Lee Hyun Ji, Lee Sung-Jae, Jung Jong-Myung, Lee Tae Hoon, Jeong Chandong, Lee Tae Jin, Jang Ji-Eun, Lee Jae-Won

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, 9988 Joint & Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2023 May;173:e156-e167. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a common phenomenon after lumbar fusion. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may provide an alternative treatment method for ASD. This study used finite element analysis to evaluate the biomechanical effects of LLIF with various fixation options and identify an optimal surgical strategy for ASD.

METHODS

A validated L1-S1 finite element model was modified for simulation. Six finite element models of the lumbar spine were created and were divided into group 1 (L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion [PLIF] + L3-4 LLIF) and group 2 (L5-S1 PLIF + L4-5 LLIF). Each group consisted of 1) cage-alone, 2) cage + lateral screw fixation (LSF), and 3) cage + bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) models. The range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet loads of adjacent segments as well as interbody cage stress were analyzed.

RESULTS

The stress on the LLIF cage-superior endplate interface was highest in the cage-alone model followed by the cage + LSF model and cage + BPSF model. The increase in range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet loads at the adjacent segment was highest in the cage + BPSF model followed by the cage + LSF model and cage-alone model. However, the biomechanical effect on the adjacent segment seemed similar in the cage-alone and cage + LSF models.

CONCLUSIONS

LLIF with BPSF is recommended when performing LLIF surgery for ASD after L4-5 and L5-S1 PLIF. Considering cage subsidence and biomechanical effects on the adjacent segment, LLIF with LSF may be a suboptimal option for ASD surgery.

摘要

目的

相邻节段退变(ASD)是腰椎融合术后的常见现象。腰椎侧方椎间融合术(LLIF)可能为ASD提供一种替代治疗方法。本研究采用有限元分析来评估不同固定方式下LLIF的生物力学效应,并确定针对ASD的最佳手术策略。

方法

对经过验证的L1 - S1有限元模型进行修改以进行模拟。创建了六个腰椎有限元模型,并分为第1组(L4 - 5后路腰椎椎间融合术[PLIF]+L3 - 4 LLIF)和第2组(L5 - S1 PLIF+L4 - 5 LLIF)。每组包括1)单纯椎间融合器、2)椎间融合器+侧方螺钉固定(LSF)和3)椎间融合器+双侧椎弓根螺钉固定(BPSF)模型。分析了相邻节段的活动范围、椎间盘内压力、小关节负荷以及椎间融合器应力。

结果

单纯椎间融合器模型中LLIF椎间融合器 - 上终板界面的应力最高,其次是椎间融合器+LSF模型和椎间融合器+BPSF模型。相邻节段活动范围、椎间盘内压力和小关节负荷的增加在椎间融合器+BPSF模型中最高,其次是椎间融合器+LSF模型和单纯椎间融合器模型。然而,单纯椎间融合器模型和椎间融合器+LSF模型对相邻节段的生物力学效应似乎相似。

结论

在L4 - 5和L5 - S1 PLIF术后对ASD进行LLIF手术时,建议采用BPSF。考虑到椎间融合器下沉以及对相邻节段的生物力学效应,LLIF联合LSF可能是ASD手术的次优选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验