Suppr超能文献

SQuID 方案(糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者皮下胰岛素输注):对急诊科操作指标的影响。

The SQuID protocol (subcutaneous insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis): Impacts on ED operational metrics.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;30(8):800-808. doi: 10.1111/acem.14685. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies using fast-acting subcutaneous (SQ) insulin analogs in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, allowing treatment of mild-to-moderate (MTM)-severity DKA patients in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings. However, emergency department (ED)-based studies are few, with limited exploration of impacts on operational metrics.

METHODS

We implemented the SQuID (Subcutaneous Insulin in Diabetic Ketoacidosis) protocol for adults with MTM-severity DKA in an urban academic ED, collecting data from August 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. We examined fidelity (frequency of required q2h glucose checks), safety (proportion of patients administered rescue dextrose for hypoglycemia), and ED length of stay (EDLOS) for the SQuID cohort compared to patients (non-ICU) treated with a traditional insulin infusion. We also examined ICU admission rate among MTM-severity DKA patients after introduction of SQuID to two historical control periods (pre-intervention and pre-COVID). We used Mann-Whitney U to test for differences in EDLOS distributions, bootstrapped (n = 1000) confidence intervals (CIs) for EDLOS median differences, and the two-sample z-test for differences in ICU admissions.

RESULTS

We identified 177 MTM-severity DKA patients in the study period (78 SQuID, 99 traditional cohort) and 163 preintervention and 161 pre-COVID historical control patients. Fidelity to the SQuID pathway was good, with glucose checks exceeding the q2-h requirement. We found no difference in the proportion of rescue dextrose administration compared to the traditional pathway. We observed significant reductions in median EDLOS for the SQuID cohort compared to the traditional cohort during the study period (-3.0, 95% CI -8.5 to -1.4), the preintervention period (-1.4, 95% CI -3.1 to -0.1), and the pre-COVID control period (-3.6, 95% CI -7.5 to -1.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center study at an academic ED, treatment of patients with MTM-severity DKA with a SQ insulin protocol was effective, demonstrated equivalent safety, and reduced ED length of stay.

摘要

背景

在糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)中使用速效皮下(SQ)胰岛素类似物的研究已经证明了其疗效、安全性和成本效益,使得在非重症监护病房(ICU)环境中治疗轻度至中度(MTM)严重程度的 DKA 患者成为可能。然而,基于急诊科(ED)的研究较少,对操作指标的影响也有限。

方法

我们在城市学术 ED 中实施了成人 MTM 严重程度 DKA 的 SQuID(糖尿病酮症酸中毒中的皮下胰岛素)方案,从 2021 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 28 日收集数据。我们比较了 SQuID 队列与接受传统胰岛素输注治疗的非 ICU 患者的治疗效果(低血糖患者接受救援葡萄糖的比例)和 ED 住院时间(EDLOS)。我们还研究了 SQuID 引入前后 MTM 严重程度 DKA 患者的 ICU 入院率,引入前后分别为两个历史对照期(干预前和 COVID 前)。我们使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验来检验 EDLOS 分布的差异,使用 bootstrap(n=1000)检验 EDLOS 中位数差异的置信区间,以及使用两样本 z 检验检验 ICU 入院率的差异。

结果

我们在研究期间确定了 177 例 MTM 严重程度 DKA 患者(78 例 SQuID,99 例传统队列)和 163 例干预前和 161 例 COVID 前的历史对照患者。SQuID 途径的治疗效果很好,血糖检查超过了 q2-h 的要求。与传统途径相比,我们没有发现救援葡萄糖给药比例的差异。与传统队列相比,SQuID 队列在研究期间(-3.0,95%CI -8.5 至 -1.4)、干预前(-1.4,95%CI -3.1 至 -0.1)和 COVID 前对照期(-3.6,95%CI -7.5 至 -1.8)的 EDLOS 中位数显著降低。

结论

在这项来自学术 ED 的单中心研究中,使用 SQ 胰岛素方案治疗 MTM 严重程度 DKA 的患者是有效的,安全性相当,并且缩短了 ED 住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验